Skip to main content
Simon Wadsley's user avatar
Simon Wadsley's user avatar
Simon Wadsley's user avatar
Simon Wadsley
  • Member for 15 years, 2 months
  • Last seen this week
Loading…
comment
An invariant number of modules over Auslander Gorenstein modules
If my interpretation above is correct then I think you are asking about the quotient category $\mathcal{M}^\mu$ in the notation of that paper.
comment
An invariant number of modules over Auslander Gorenstein modules
I'm not completely sure what you are asking. Does being $\mu$-critical mean that $\mathrm{Hom}_R(M,R)\neq 0$ (ie canonical dimension $\mu$) but for every proper quotient $M/N$ of $M$, $\mathrm{Hom}_R(M/N,R)\neq 0$? In any case this paper math.washington.edu/~smith/Research/asz6.pdf of Ajitabh, Smith and Zhang is likely to be useful.
comment
When to pick a basis?
If you can prove that (1) the trace of the identity map on $V$ is $\dim V$ (and this is an integer), (2) the trace of the zero map is $0$ and (3) trace is additive in the sense that if $T_1$ acts on $V_1$ and $T_2$ acts on $V_2$ then $\mathrm{tr} (T_1\oplus T_2)=\mathrm{tr} T_1+\mathrm{tr} T_2$ then what you ask for is straightforward since if $E$ is a projector on $V$ then it decomposes canonically as $I_{\ker E}\oplus 0_{\mathrm{Im} E}$. I would imagine that for any sensible definition of trace (1), (2) and (3) should be straightforward.
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
$\mathbb{Z}G$ (left) Noetherian$\Rightarrow$ $\ell^1(G)$ is a flat (right) $\mathbb{Z}G$-module?
I'm not even sure that it is easy to extend my strategy to $G=\mathbb{Z}^n$ for $n>1$, although it may be easier than I think. Classifying right ideals in $\mathbb{C}G$ for $G$ a discrete Heisenberg group is probably hard. To get an idea why, see arxiv.org/abs/math/0102190. The first sentence of section 7 of your reference suggests that $Tor^1_{\mathbb{C}G}(\mathbb{C}G/f\mathbb{C}G,l^1(G))=0$ for all non-zero $f\in \mathbb{C}G$ whenever $G$ is torsionfree polycyclic. However, it isn't clear to me how hard this result was to prove already in that generality.
awarded
comment
$\mathbb{Z}G$ (left) Noetherian$\Rightarrow$ $\ell^1(G)$ is a flat (right) $\mathbb{Z}G$-module?
It occurs to me that in the final paragraph one might as well assume that $f$ is irreducible in $R$. Since (by the fundamental theorem of algebra) such an $f$ is a unit times $(x-\lambda)$ for $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$ non-zero it should be very easy to complete the case $G=\mathbb{Z}$ by hand.
Loading…
Loading…
revised
D-modules on rigid analytic spaces
added 172 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
1
11 12
13
14 15
21