comment
Does sets of positive capacity rule out constant functions?
I can recommend "Nonlinear Potential Theory of Degenerate Elliptic Equations" by Heinonen, Kilpeläinen, Martio; and "Function Spaces and Potential Theory" by Adams, Hedberg
comment
Reference needed: estimate of the second order derivatives
The desired estimate cannot hold on arbitrary domains, you need some boundary regularity. However, your answer does not need boundary regularity and, consequently, it should be invalid.
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Should coffee machines be placed at the region's boundary?
My reason is already in the second comment. You just have to compute the derivative, which is a standard computation.
comment
Should coffee machines be placed at the region's boundary?
No, you fix $E_i$ and only vary $x_i$. You can think of the entire process as a two-stage problem: In the first stage, you fix the regions $E_i$ and in the second stage you just optimize over the $x_i$. In the second stage, the $E_i$ are fixed and the optimization w.r.t. $x_i$ can be solved in closed form. The remaining optimization over $E_i$ is delicate.
comment
Should coffee machines be placed at the region's boundary?
In your objective, you have the contribution $\int_{E_i} \| x_i^* - x\|^2 \, \mathrm d \ell(x)$. The derivative of this term w.r.t. $x_i^*$ is zero if and only if $x_i^*$ is the center of mass.
Loading…
comment
Convexity and subdifferential monotonicity
I think that the answer depends crucially on the definition of "subdifferential". If we take the standard definition $\partial W(x) = \{ u \mid \forall y \in K : W(y) \ge W(x) + \langle u, y - x \rangle\}$, then the answer is "no". Take $K = [0, \infty) \subset \mathbb R$ and $W(x) = \sqrt{x}$. Then, the subdifferential is empty everywhere (up to the origin) and, consequently, the subdifferential mapping is monotone.
comment
When is there a Lipschitz Kantorovich Potential?
No, but you can replace $\phi$ by $\phi^{cc}$.
comment
When is there a Lipschitz Kantorovich Potential?
Once you have the existence of a solution $\phi$ of (1), you can take $\phi^{cc}$. The objective value of $\phi^{cc}$ is at least that of $\phi$, hence, it is again a solution and further, the $L$-Lipschitz continuity of $c$ implies that $c$-conjugates are $L$-Lipschitz.
answered
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Seeking references on second-order optimality conditions in $H^1(Ω)$ space
Do you have constraints on $u$?