Skip to main content
Victor's user avatar
Victor's user avatar
Victor's user avatar
Victor
  • Member for 3 years, 5 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Loading…
comment
One question about Theorem 4 in Brezis–Merle's famous paper
By hypothesis $V_n \geq 0$ in $\Omega$ and $\lVert V_n \rVert_{L^{p}} \leq C_1$ for some $1<p \leq \infty$.
Loading…
comment
A detail in one step in a theorem from a paper of Brezis and Merle
Why $k$ large enough implies that some neighborhood contains $z$? It can happens that the neighboors as $k$ gets larger are smaller and smaller always avoiding $z$
comment
Two doubts in the paper of Brezis Merle in blow up analysis of the equation $-\Delta u=Ve^u$
Why is it possible to apply Calderón - Zygmund so directly in $L^p$? I mean, following corollary 9.18 of trudinger it's possible to apply the estimate only when $f_n- \mu \in L^p$ for $p>1$, but in the situation of the theorem we have $f_n-\mu \in L^{p}_{loc}$
comment
A problem about regularity and mean value property in the Merle and Brezis work on $-\Delta u = V(x) \exp u$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ plane
Why is enough to show that $u_3^{+} \in L^{\infty}$ to conclude that $u_3 \in L^{\infty}$? why the proof ends when we show that $u^{+} \in L^{\infty}?$ It's not necessary to show this to $u^{-} \in L^{\infty}$ also?
awarded
awarded
comment
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded
awarded
comment
What is going on in the field of algebraic logic these days?
Thank you @NoahSchweber, now I have access to the article, and I think this is just what I'm looking for :) Time to read
awarded
revised
Loading…
awarded