Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Thank you both for the suggestions! @JonPridham, do you have any idea where I might access Marcy Robertson's thesis? I haven't been able to track it down.
@JonPridham Thanks for this! Are there any "standard" places where one might learn the basics about these things and their homotopy theory, or any references where they're used to circumvent issues similar to the ones I mentioned in the question?
@LiamKeenan Hi Liam! I think we've talked a little about this before, but in coming back I realize I'm not sure about a few things. First, why are we actually able to commute the whole of the bar construction with $\mathsf{Mod}_{(-)}$? (In particular, I don't think we have $(\mathsf{Mod}_A)^{op}\simeq\mathsf{Mod}_{A^{op}}$, or am I wrong?) Second, what happens when we restrict to $\mathsf{Perf}_A$? I think this is where we should have an equivalence between $HH(\mathsf{Perf}_A/\mathcal{Pr}^L)$ (and/or $HH(\mathsf{Perf}_A/\mathcal{Pr}_{st}^L)$) and $THH(A)$.
@MaximeRamzi Well, $A$ for me is a commutative dg-algebra over (an ordinary ring) $k,$ so modules over $A$ are already chain complexes in some sense. I don't think I want to take chain complexes of dg-modules/chain complexes (although perhaps I'm mistaken), although I might mean take the dg-nerve of the full subcategory of fibrant-cofibrant objects in an appropriate model structure.
@MaximeRamzi Thanks for your comments. Yes, I mean for all my rings/algebras/etc. to be commutative. As for $D(\mathsf{Perf}_A)$ and $D(\mathsf{Mod}_A),$ it may very well be that these are the same -- I'm not fluent in the $\infty$-categorical language, but I believe that for both of these I want the $\infty$-category which is the dg-nerve of the corresponding dg-categories. (If there are alternative definitions that I should be considering, I would be interested in hearing about them.)