Skip to main content
Wolfgang Jeltsch's user avatar
Wolfgang Jeltsch's user avatar
Wolfgang Jeltsch's user avatar
Wolfgang Jeltsch
  • Member for 12 years, 4 months
  • Last seen more than 1 year ago
revised
Loading…
Loading…
revised
What is the right adjoint of the tensor product in a closed monoidal functor category?
removed the paranthetical remark about replacing i’s by y’s, since I have corrected this problem in my original question now
Loading…
comment
What is the right adjoint of the tensor product in a closed monoidal functor category?
To me it seems that these formulas are not type correct. I think $\mathscr A(A, B)$ is an object of $\mathscr V$, while $FB$ and $GB$ are objects of $\mathscr X$ (and $\otimes$ lives in $\mathscr X$). Can you please clarify?
comment
What is the right adjoint of the tensor product in a closed monoidal functor category?
Thank you very much. I also like these formulas more that the one with the product ($\prod$). The $\prod_{I(x, y)}$ only specifies how the functor under the $\int$ maps objects ($y$); it does not say how this functor maps morphisms.
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Models of intuitionistic linear logic that reflect the resource interpretation
Thank you; this was very helpful indeed. Lokhorst cites the paper “Linear Logic on Petri Nets” by Engberg and Winskel, which seems to be relevant as well.
comment
Pushouts in the category of adjunctions
So I have to specify what morphisms between adjunctions should be. I think that the canonical answer would be that a morphisms from $F \dashv G$ to $F' \dashv G'$ is a pair of natural transformations $\varphi : F \to F'$ and $\gamma : G \to G'$ such that $\varepsilon' \circ (\varphi \bullet \gamma) = \varepsilon : F \bullet G \to \mathrm{Id}$ and $(\gamma \bullet \varphi) \circ \eta = \eta' : \mathrm{Id} \to G' \bullet F'$. However I do not know how pushouts in 2-categories are defined. Any hints?
revised
Loading…
suggested
Approve
Loading…
asked
Loading…