Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
To me it seems that these formulas are not type correct. I think $\mathscr A(A, B)$ is an object of $\mathscr V$, while $FB$ and $GB$ are objects of $\mathscr X$ (and $\otimes$ lives in $\mathscr X$). Can you please clarify?
Thank you very much. I also like these formulas more that the one with the product ($\prod$). The $\prod_{I(x, y)}$ only specifies how the functor under the $\int$ maps objects ($y$); it does not say how this functor maps morphisms.
Thank you; this was very helpful indeed. Lokhorst cites the paper “Linear Logic on Petri Nets” by Engberg and Winskel, which seems to be relevant as well.
So I have to specify what morphisms between adjunctions should be. I think that the canonical answer would be that a morphisms from $F \dashv G$ to $F' \dashv G'$ is a pair of natural transformations $\varphi : F \to F'$ and $\gamma : G \to G'$ such that $\varepsilon' \circ (\varphi \bullet \gamma) = \varepsilon : F \bullet G \to \mathrm{Id}$ and $(\gamma \bullet \varphi) \circ \eta = \eta' : \mathrm{Id} \to G' \bullet F'$. However I do not know how pushouts in 2-categories are defined. Any hints?