comment
Correctness of the algorithm for the A329369, A347205 and related sequences
Could you add details on how to make a single loop in this case to calculate values without recursion?
comment
Correctness of the algorithm for the A329369, A347205 and related sequences
Ok, I hope that the OEIS editors will treat your opinion as authoritative, in case I want to add my code to the sequences under consideration.
comment
Correctness of the algorithm for the A329369, A347205 and related sequences
Thank you for answer! Could you please add the details of the equivalence?
comment
Correctness of the algorithm for the A329369, A347205 and related sequences
@PeterTaylor, thank you for comment! Done. Here $L$ is the number of $0$s in the binary expansion of $2n$.
revised
Loading…
revised
Test for pair of odd primes $(p, 2p^2-1)$
added 106 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
revised
On A057985 and A287066
added 1346 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
Loading…
asked
Loading…
revised
Sequence derived from transform of a given vector (with Fibonacci as partial sums)
added 53 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Sequence derived from transform of a given vector (with Fibonacci as partial sums)
added 12 characters in body
Loading…
comment
On a A089039 and pair of sequences with simple recursion
@DaveBenson, thank you for comment! Unfortunately, I am blocked in the encyclopedia. :)
awarded
comment
On a A089039 and pair of sequences with simple recursion
@MaxAlekseyev, please note that I am not a mathematician, but just an experimenter. Most of my experiments are random. OEIS is my best friend in the sense that I just slightly change something in some natural result and often find a simpler formula or algorithm for an already known sequence. Of course, I want to share such findings, marking them as true. To calm my conscience, I ask questions here and additionally add links to proofs, if anyone provide any.
comment
On a A089039 and pair of sequences with simple recursion
@MaxAlekseyev, thank you for comment! I absolutely agree with you, but at the same time, numerical verification is enough for me (usually up to $10^6$ plus a few random terms for significantly large indexes).
Loading…