Skip to main content
Saal Hardali's user avatar
Saal Hardali's user avatar
Saal Hardali's user avatar
Saal Hardali
  • Member for 12 years, 8 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Is there a PL, or topological, bordism hypothesis?
Just a trivial observation: There's a sense in which the Cobordism Hypothesis is a (far reaching) generalization of the Pontryagin Thom theorem about bordism groups. However, the latter relies very heavily on transverality (and is in fact false for topological manifolds). So a topological analog would have to somehow exclude this part of the story.
comment
Characterizing pseudo-differential operators as a subalgebra of continuous endomorphisms of tempered distributions
It seems like this could work. Although i'm not so familiar with SG symbols. I should brush up on that first (regarding the completness as you say).
comment
Characterizing pseudo-differential operators as a subalgebra of continuous endomorphisms of tempered distributions
hmmm, i'm not sure I understand your point about the boundness, could you say a few words about the boundness? This is the part i'm least sure about. Also the completeness isn't at all obvious to me for the second class of symbols you propose.
comment
Characterizing pseudo-differential operators as a subalgebra of continuous endomorphisms of tempered distributions
Could you elaborate on why the second algebra you give satisfies 3? it doesn't seem obvious but maybe im missing something.
comment
Characterizing pseudo-differential operators as a subalgebra of continuous endomorphisms of tempered distributions
@mcd The constancy in $p$ condition (3) might be a problem with nonzero $\delta$ as well. As for "SG" or "Shubin" i'm not familiar with these terms
comment
Characterizing pseudo-differential operators as a subalgebra of continuous endomorphisms of tempered distributions
@mcd In my symbol classes $\delta$ is always $0$, I got the impression that for arbitrary $\delta$ the completeness condition In my question may fail. In any case if i'm wrong about that I was hoping that perhaps the extra minimality comdition will take care of this.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Well-posedness for equations of the form $u_t = grad[V(u)]$ and $u_{tt}=grad[V(u)]$?
Thanks, although I was aware of this fact I didn't think about this when forming the question. In any case is there an apriori reason why someone should expect the rotated heat equation to be ill posed from just looking at the derivatives? (without knowing beforehand the solution of the usual heat equation)
comment
Well-posedness for equations of the form $u_t = grad[V(u)]$ and $u_{tt}=grad[V(u)]$?
Thank you for this! I understand the example of the rotated heat equation but is there a way to make precise the general principle you alluded to "Cauchy problem is usually ill-posed, because the order of space derivatives is less than that of the time derivative"?
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
1
11 12
13
14 15
51