Skip to main content
Bazin's user avatar
Bazin's user avatar
Bazin's user avatar
Bazin
  • Member for 12 years, 9 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
Fourier transform of the critical line of zeta?
Thanks, I have corrected this. I had in mind the fact that $\zeta(\bar z)=\overline{\zeta(z)}$.
revised
Fourier transform of the critical line of zeta?
deleted 12 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Fundamental solution of Discrete Laplace in the plane
Try the discrete dbar and its adjoint: both should have homogeneity $-1$ and their convolution should provide the fundamental solution of the Laplace operator.
revised
Loading…
revised
Composition algebra of Gevrey function for $s<1$
added 1436 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Composition algebra of Gevrey function for $s<1$
@CPJ Thanks for your comment. In fact with $M_n=n^{ns}$, we get $(M_n/n^n)^{1/n}=n^{s-1}$ which is increasing for $s\ge 1$. This suggests that the composition algebra property holds for $s\ge 1$ but not for $s<1$.
comment
Composition algebra of Gevrey function for $s<1$
@Piero D'Ancona You mean $s'<s$ since the Gevrey space $G^{(s)}$ with the notation above is increasing with $s$, e.g. analytic is $G^{(1)}$ is included in $G^{(2)}$ which contains compactly supported functions. On the other hand, I believe that the answer to the question is positive and is a matter of writing a precise Faà de Bruno formula.
revised
Composition algebra of Gevrey function for $s<1$
deleted 98 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Schwartz kernel
There was a typo (now erased) with an unwanted ' in the last sentence.
revised
Schwartz kernel
deleted 1 character in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
Trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function are simple
@Igor Rivin It is indeed possible to define the Riemann Zeta function on the whole complex plane as a meromorphic function with a single simple pole at 1, using a variation of Euler-MacLaurin formula, much simpler to handle than the functional equation.
1
29 30
31
32 33
49