awarded
comment
How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?
You get the boundedness from the Hardy space $\mathscr H^1$ into $L^1$ with the atomic decomposition and by duality follows the boundedness from $L^\infty$ to BMO (which is the dual of $\mathscr H^1$).
comment
How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?
In fact I refer to the fact that the maximal function sends $L^1$ in $L^1_w$ and then I use the $L^2$ bounedness and the Marcinkiewicz Interpolation Theorem to get the $L^p$ boundedness for $p\in (1,2]$ and duality for finite exponents.
comment
Reference request: a singular differential equation
Take $a=1/2$, $f=0$, so that the equation reads $2x z'=z$. Multiplying both sides by $z$, calling $y=z^2$, you get $xy'=y$ and thus $y=\alpha x$. If $z$ is analytic, $\alpha\not=0$ and $\zeta= \alpha^{-1/2}z$, you found an analytic function $\zeta$ such that $\zeta^2=x$, which is not possible. Thus $z=0$.
comment
Reference request: a singular differential equation
Take $a=1/2$, $f=0$, so that the equation reads $2x z'=z$. Multiplying both sides by $z$, calling $y=z^2$, you get $xy'=y$ and thus $y=\alpha x$. If $z$ is analytic, $:alpha\not=0$,and $\zeta= \alpha^{-1/2}z$, you found an analytic function $\zeta$ such that $\zeta^2=x$, which is not possible. Thus $z=0$.
Loading…
revised
How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?
Extension and comments.
Loading…
revised
How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?
Extension and comments.
Loading…
comment
Is the 2D Ladyzhenskaya inequality true for periodic functions?
@Jack Yes, but it is not completely obvious, you have to write$$u(x,y)=u(a,y)+\int_a^x(\partial_1u)(s,y) ds$$ and the similar formula for $u(x,y)=u(x,b)+\dots$. Then you have an expression for $\vert u(x,y)\vert^2$ that you can apply to $u=v^2$.
answered
Loading…
comment
Differentiablity of certain composite function
No, you just have to think about the continuous canonical injection mentioned above.
comment
Is the 2D Ladyzhenskaya inequality true for periodic functions?
I have added a comment on periodic functions in my answer.
revised
Is the 2D Ladyzhenskaya inequality true for periodic functions?
Some more comments on periodic functions.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Gaps in the spectrum of Laplace-Beltrami operators
Thanks a lot, I am indeed very grateful for your help. I do not believe that Weyl's law is enough for the stability of gaps since it probably could be the same with eigenvalues spread on the interval $(k,k+1)$ instead of being clustered at the integers. Also, it is surprising to me that the references that you kindly indicate are so recent; I should say that I thought that, for a smooth perturbation it was either wrong or classical.
Loading…
Loading…