Skip to main content
Joseph Hundley's user avatar
Joseph Hundley's user avatar
Joseph Hundley's user avatar
Joseph Hundley
  • Member for 12 years, 10 months
  • Last seen more than 6 years ago
awarded
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
awarded
comment
Functoriality for non-split orthogonal groups
How is $L(s, \pi \times \widetilde \pi)$ for $\pi$ as above defined? Likewise $L(s, \pi \times \bar \phi)$?
awarded
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Why is the L group of an even unitary group what it is?
Thanks. I guess I never mastered how to compute the endomorphism of the pinning, since I've worked mostly with split groups. Can you recommend a specific reference?
Loading…
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
Is the adjoint L-function on GL(m) holomorphic?
(3) I should perhaps mention that the integral representation in the case m=5 is not really complete. The unramified computation is reduced to an identity which we are able to check in some special cases but not prove in general.
comment
Is the adjoint L-function on GL(m) holomorphic?
(1) If I'm not mistaken, the Flicker result only applies to representations with a supercuspidal component. Which means that-- again, if I'm not mistaken-- even the case m=3 is not completely solved. (2) The integral representations mentioned all involve Eisenstein series which have poles, so they do not give holomorphy automatically. A useful idea for showing that poles of the Eisenstein series are not inherited by the L function is given in Ginzburg-Jiang JNT 82 pp. 256--287. But one still needs to worry about Archimedean and ramified places.
Loading…
comment
(When) can the presentation in Steinberg's Yale notes fail to give an algebraic group?
That seems plausible, but I'm looking at the presentation attached to a root system in section 6 of the Steinberg notes, and it looks to me like in the $A_1$ case it would just give $SL_2(k)$ not $SL_2(k)/\pm 1.$
comment
(When) can the presentation in Steinberg's Yale notes fail to give an algebraic group?
I don't think this is a metaplectic group thing. I've clarified the question as best I can. Thanks for your help.