Skip to main content
Salvo Tringali's user avatar
Salvo Tringali's user avatar
Salvo Tringali's user avatar
Salvo Tringali
  • Member for 13 years, 5 months
  • Last seen this week
  • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
comment
On the independence of lower and upper asymptotic and Banach densities
Here is an old thread where a more difficult question is addressed: mathoverflow.net/questions/103111/…. The thread has also the sketch of an answer by @Anthony Quas (mathoverflow.net/a/103127/16537), but there is no reference to the question stated in the OP there.
awarded
revised
Prescribed values for the uniform density
Fixed a typo in an inequality
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Conditions for an analogue of Cauchy-Davenport for simple groups
Extended the answer to make it fit the topic
Loading…
revised
Conditions for an analogue of Cauchy-Davenport for simple groups
Extended the answer to make it fit the topic
Loading…
revised
Conditions for an analogue of Cauchy-Davenport for simple groups
Removed extras from a previous version of the post
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
On the independence of lower and upper asymptotic and Banach densities
@Gabriel. I've at least two issues with your answer. First, as you too have remarked, it doesn't answer my question. Second, I'm not so convinced that, after filling in the technical details that you're alluding to, the construction you are suggesting will still be so fairly easy: I might mention a number of situations where constructions involving densities are relatively easy (or even trivial to some degree) as long as the "relevant parameters" are rational, but get significantly more complicated otherwise. In any case, thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
revised
Loading…
revised
On the independence of lower and upper asymptotic and Banach densities
Fixed grammar and added something on the logarithmic densities
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Sums of sets of lower density 0
For what it's worth, here is a proof that the asymptotic density of $Q_2$ is zero, which doesn't depend on Landau's result: mathoverflow.net/a/205866/16537.
1
66 67
68
69 70
89