Skip to main content
Antoine Labelle's user avatar
Antoine Labelle's user avatar
Antoine Labelle's user avatar
Antoine Labelle
  • Member for 4 years, 5 months
  • Last seen this week
  • Montreal
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs (2)
added 1 character in body
Loading…
accepted
answered
Loading…
comment
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs (2)
I think you're right, I got confused. The union bound couldn't work for the first version of the question because of factors of $\varepsilon$, but I think it might work here, thought I have to think that through.
comment
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs
Sorry about that. I posted the modified question here : mathoverflow.net/q/423392/160416.
asked
Loading…
accepted
revised
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs
deleted 413 characters in body
Loading…
comment
revised
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs
added 411 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Discrepancy of random bipartite graphs
Thanks, I didn't thought about that. In this case I guess that the question I really want to ask is: for a fixed $\epsilon$, does there exist $K(\epsilon)$ such that for $k>K(\epsilon)$ the discrepancy is $<\epsilon$ almost surely as $n \to \infty$.
asked
Loading…
awarded
comment
Generalization of "Lagrange interpolation" over non-division rings
The theorem only applies when $f$ is a polynomial function, not any function. In other words, the theorem assumes that $f$ is represented by some polynomial and proves that it is then (uniquely) represented by a polynomial satisfying the given bounds on the coefficients.
revised
Loading…
suggested
Approve
1
5 6
7
8 9
16