Skip to main content
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May
  • Member for 14 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
answered
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Inner hom and geometric realization.
That is an excellent point. The answer is yes, but I'm very fond of minimal complexes. (I'm much less fond of minimal fibrations). So I prefer the illuminating proof that uses them. However, this result is the simplicial analogue of the Whitehead theorem that a weak equivalence between CW complexes is a homotopy equivalence, and it is possible to mimic the proof of that result. After the fact, of course, these are both instances of the model theoretic statement that a weak equivalence between cofibrant and fibrant objects is a homotopy equivalence.
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Definition of an E-infinity algebra
You are mixing contexts and definitions in a fairly confused way. $E_{\infty}$ algebras make sense in many categories. There are many symmetric monoidal categories of spectra (historically, the first, by a nose, was constructed in EKMM (Elmendorf-Kriz-Mandell-May). In any such category, commutative monoids, alias commutative ring spectra, are equivalent to $E_{\infty}$ algebras in the relevant category of spectra.
answered
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
1
38 39 40 41
42