Skip to main content
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May
  • Member for 14 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
answered
Loading…
awarded
answered
Loading…
comment
Reference request: Equivariant Topology
Mike, you write ``it is very easy to carry out computations ...''. Of course, Mackey functors only apply when you are in an RO(G)-graded context. But that is a detail. As you know, you lucked out in the Kervaire invariant one problem and only needed "easy'' computations. To avoid giving a wrong impression, people should be warned that in fact there are relatively few fully worked computations, and even things like rational equivariant characteristic classes in Bredon cohomology are still unknown. This is an area in desperate need of hard work, even for cyclic groups of prime order.
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
answered
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
comment
Can the set of iso classes of G-equivariant H-bundles be given by ordinary homotopy classes of non-equivariant maps?
Better you should get higher category theory off your brain: it only distracts here. Just look at representations versus bundles.
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
comment
The category of posets
Right you are, I mean T_0 Alexandrov spaces, or else I should say preorders.
answered
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Equivalence between $E_\infty$-spaces and connective spectra
Think about what $\Omega^{\infty}$ would mean in the simplicial world. There are serious advantages to being eclectic. For a different, Segalic answer to your original question see Mandell, May, Schwede, Shipley ``Model categories of diagram spectra'', especially \S 18.
1
34 35
36
37 38
42