Skip to main content
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May's user avatar
Peter May
  • Member for 14 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
awarded
answered
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
comment
Kervaire invariant: Why dimension 126 especially difficult?
I should probably add that I hope you are right, since I have a student who hopes to prove that you are (homotopically of course).
comment
Kervaire invariant: Why dimension 126 especially difficult?
Interesting. But I think to give it substance you would have to display a manifold of dimension 62 and Kervaire invariant one.
comment
Homology versus cohomology of Lie groups
Surely an alternative proof is not irrelevant! In the Rothenberg-Steenrod spectral sequence, when H_*(G;k) is an exterior algebra, E_2 is a polynomial algebra, there are no differentials for dimensional reasons (if char k is not 2) and it follows immediately that H^*(BG;k) is a polynomial algebra. In char 0, being an exterior algebra is equivalent to being commutative. McCleary's 6.38 is stated for general (perfect) fields, with the evident hypotheses. The universally transgressive hypothesis ensures that H_*(G;k) is an exterior algebra, which is what connects the proofs. Peace.
revised
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
1
31 32
33
34 35
42