Skip to main content
LOCOAS's user avatar
LOCOAS's user avatar
LOCOAS's user avatar
LOCOAS
  • Member for 5 years, 8 months
  • Last seen this week
  • Japan
comment
Is there a non-semistable simple sheaf?
Thank you for the anwer. Could you explain why there is a degree 1 line bundle which is not effective.
awarded
Loading…
accepted
comment
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
Thank you for your answer! It was very convincing from a philosophical point of view.
awarded
answered
Loading…
awarded
awarded
comment
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
@abx What you are saying is completely correct. We can interpret all claims in the proper sense. However, I am afraid that the above assertion about the smallness of the pair may produces errors in various places. So I would like to know if I am wrong in the above discussion.
comment
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
@LSpice My source is exactly the part pointed out by abx.
comment
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
@abx If that were the case, we would have to treat a category as an ordered pair of a set of morohisms, compositions, and so on. In that case, we end up with the same problem.
comment
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
@Zhen Lin In page 2 of SGA 4 (see abx's link above), he says 'On dit qu’un ensemble est U-petit (ou, quand aucune confusion n’en résulte, petit) s’il est isomorphe à un élément de U.'
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
accepted
comment
Why do we care about small sets?
Thank you very much! It was very helpful for me!