Skip to main content
Fabius Wiesner's user avatar
Fabius Wiesner's user avatar
Fabius Wiesner's user avatar
Fabius Wiesner
  • Member for 5 years, 9 months
  • Last seen this week
  • Italia
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@RichardStanley I am not doing the opposite, the join is above in the diagram. I don't understand if your comment is aimed at simplifying my argument or if it gives the proof required in the very last question in my post.
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@RichardStanley excuse me, but with a union closed family aren't we generating $L$ with the join operation rather than the meet operation?
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@SamHopkins thank you for your comments. I think that I managed to do the easy part, and can be satisfied by having shown that we can restrict the elements to only meet-irreducible ones. However, proving or disproving that this is a representation with a minimum number of elements seems more difficult.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Loading…
1
3 4
5
6 7
21