revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
added 217 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
added 56 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
added 300 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
Simplified the original question
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
added 139 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@RichardStanley I am not doing the opposite, the join is above in the diagram. I don't understand if your comment is aimed at simplifying my argument or if it gives the proof required in the very last question in my post.
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
deleted 249 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@RichardStanley excuse me, but with a union closed family aren't we generating $L$ with the join operation rather than the meet operation?
revised
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
added 41 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
@SamHopkins thank you for your comments. I think that I managed to do the easy part, and can be satisfied by having shown that we can restrict the elements to only meet-irreducible ones. However, proving or disproving that this is a representation with a minimum number of elements seems more difficult.
revised
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
added 1311 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
added 562 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
added 73 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets
added 30 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Minimum of the maximum element frequency given the family size and the universe size
added 483 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Minimum of the maximum element frequency given the family size and the universe size
added 402 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
added 249 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Do there exist at least two sets whose union gives the universe in a certain intersection-closed family of sets?
Clarified what intersection-closed is meant for a "multiset" family.
Loading…