Skip to main content
24601's user avatar
24601's user avatar
24601's user avatar
24601
  • Member for 6 years, 4 months
  • Last seen more than a week ago
comment
Is every codimension-one homology class of a closed manifold represented by a $\pi_1$-injective embedded submanifold?
Thanks for your answer @HJRW. It would be very interesting to see whether one could prove that the property of a homomorphism to $\mathbb{Z}$ being dominated by a splitting over finitely presented subgroups is “open” in the same sense as the BNS invariants.
awarded
comment
Is every codimension-one homology class of a closed manifold represented by a $\pi_1$-injective embedded submanifold?
Thanks all for your answers. Indeed I am in fact interested in studying kernes of homomorphisms $\pi_1(M) \to \mathbb{Z}$ and whether they can be realised as direct limits of “nice” subgroups of $\pi_1(M)$
comment
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded
awarded
comment
Uniqueness of JSJ deformation space when there are no QH vertices
@HJRW ah of course, thank you. Sorry, I fundamentally misunderstood a part of the definition. It is clear to me now why there should only ever be one non-trivial deformation space.
comment
Uniqueness of JSJ deformation space when there are no QH vertices
Apologies for making myself unclear. In my question, $\mathcal{A}$ is the set of subgroups containing edge stabilisers of the splitting. So for instance, if $\Sigma$ is a large enough closed surface, $G = \pi_1(\Sigma)$ and $\mathcal{A}$ is the set of cyclic subgroups of $G$, then any two non-isotopic pair of pants decompositions of $\Sigma$ induce two cyclic splittings which live in two distinct deformation spaces (which are singletons).
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
Loading…