Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
When it comes to polynomial Szemeredi, there are no better bounds known for coloring than for density, except in cases where the only bounds for density are from Bergelson-Leibman and the bounds for the coloring versions are then just from Shelah, Walters, etc.
Great! I think I do need something independent of d to actually get primitive recursive bounds in my paper. It would be nice if someone could fix the "problematic" proof...
Good catch, although your comment only applies to the squares case. For squares I think $L(p)$ is bigger, because for instance we can use the squares of everything up to $d\sqrt{p}$ and then we expect a $2\sqrt{p(1-d^2)}$ increasing sequence left that is compatible with this. This can yield anything up to $\sqrt{5p}$ although empirical evidence suggests $\sqrt{6p}$ is the answer. For inverses, cubes, fourth powers, and so on, empirical evidence suggests it appears to approach $2\sqrt{p}$. I am pretty sure that squares are the only exceptional case.