Skip to main content
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine
  • Member for 13 years, 11 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Loading…
comment
Smooth and analytic structures on low dimensional euclidian spaces
Grauert-Remmert is probably irrelevant for this simple case.
comment
Smooth and analytic structures on low dimensional euclidian spaces
Thanks a lot Steven for the link. So do you know of a simple proof that there exists only one real analytic structure on $\mathbb{R}$ which is compatible with its smooth structure?
revised
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
comment
Deformation theory over the field of algebraic numbers
So know very little about deformation theory but in my setting do we have the existence of a miniversal deformation $g:Y\rightarrow FormalSpec(R)$ which reduces modulo the maximal ideal of $R$ to $X_0\rightarrow Spec(\overline{\mathbb{Q}})$ Because if we have such a miniversal deformation then I think that this is good enough. So in otherwords, there is no need to have a moduli space!
accepted
comment
On the Weyl character formula
No, I used the word geometry in a more naive sense, i.e., understanding enough about the action of the Weyl group on the root system $\Delta$ in order to deduce the Weyl integral formula.
revised
On the Weyl character formula
deleted 1049 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
On the Weyl character formula
Thnaks a lot for your nice set of notes :)
asked
Loading…
accepted
comment
Torsion in the Betti cohomology of complex surfaces
Thanks Tom, yes if you don't take the involution then this is the classical example of an Hopf surface!
comment
Torsion in the Betti cohomology of complex surfaces
Yes, I just worked it out for myself. I had forgotten about the universal coefficient theorem for chain complexes. I also just amused myself to construct explicitly all the $n$ extensions in $Ext(\mathbb{Z}/n,\mathbb{Z})$.
awarded
comment
Torsion in the Betti cohomology of complex surfaces
Thnaks Donu. But I guess that in general there is no reason why the torsion in $H^1$ should inject in $H^2$. May be I should also require $X$ to be simply connected. In any case, thanks for your example.
1
41 42
43
44 45
47