Skip to main content
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
Hugo Chapdelaine
  • Member for 13 years, 11 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
So in my question I'm only asking for a morphism of Hodge structure. My point is that a map which respects the torus action seems to be stronger than a map which only respects the filtration.
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
Well, I never talked about mixed Hodge structure but only pure Hodge structure so there is no Galois action and therefore no weight filtration
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
Well I'll try to resolve my confusion, any way thanks Donu.
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
So going back to my example we find that $F^k H_{C}=C$ if $k\leq 0$ and $0$ if $k>0$. Similarly we find that $H_{\mathbf{C}}'=\mathbf{C}$ if $k\leq 1$ and $0$ if $k>1$. Therefore for all $k$ we have that $F^k H_{\mathbf{C}}\subseteq F^k H_{\mathbf{C}}'$.
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
So you see I'm not asking that my map respects the torus action but simply that it respects the Hodge filtration which is somehow weaker
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
Well may be I'm confused but take $H_{Q}=Q$ and $H_{Q}'=Q$ with the identity map $\iota: H_Q\rightarrow H_{Q'}$. If you place $H_Q$ in degree $(0,0)$ and $H_{Q}'$ in degree $(1,1)$ then this respects the Hodge filtration, isn't ?
comment
comment
On morphisms of pure Hodge structures of decreasing weight
Well I have a counter-example to what you said take $H_{\mathbf{C}}=\mathbf{C}$ place in degree $(0,0)$ and take $H_{\mathbf{C}}=\mathbf{C}$ place in degree $(1,1)$.
Loading…
comment
On the finitess of algebraic De Rham cohomology of smooth quasi-projective variety
Well, if you use Hironaka's desingularization theorem then I guess that you can express (using the Leray spectral sequence) the cohomology of $Y$ in terms of the cohomology of a compactification of $Y$ and of the normal crossing divisors. Is it what you have in mind ?
Loading…
accepted
comment
On rational points of conics
Hi Pete, I guess that I had to reprove for myself that if $D$ (a divisor defined over $K$) has degree $1$ on a rational curve then necessarily it is equivalent to an effective divisor of degree $1$ defined over $K$ was not completely obvious to me, but I agree that it is fairly straightforward once you think about it.
answered
Loading…
comment
On rational points of conics
In any case, thanks MP for your solution, I don't mind to use Riemann-Roch.
comment
On rational points of conics
Ok so your argument is kind of non trivial since here you are using Riemann-Roch over the field $K$ isn't it ?
asked
Loading…
accepted
revised
On a special case of Alexander duality
deleted 20 characters in body
Loading…
1
34 35
36
37 38
47