Skip to main content
Sylvain JULIEN's user avatar
Sylvain JULIEN's user avatar
Sylvain JULIEN's user avatar
Sylvain JULIEN
Unregistered
  • Member for 14 years
awarded
comment
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
I was thinking of continuity since the map $f$ preserves the "inner product" defined for $(F,G)\in\mathcal{S}^{2}$ by $\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to\infty}\dfrac{1}{\log\log x}\sum_{p\leq x}\dfrac{a_{p}(F)\overline{a_{p}(G)}}{p}}$, so that $f$ appears to be some kind of an isometry of the Selberg class. And as generally speaking, an isometry is a continuous map...
comment
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
But wouldn't it be possible to consider the conditions above as some kind of continuity assumptions that would make identity and complex conjugation the only possible maps such as condition 4) is true? A bit like the only continuous field automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ are namely the identity and the complex conjugation?
comment
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
Could someone give a rigorous proof (always assuming Selberg's orthonormality conjecture) of the fact that there is no other automorphism than the identity and the complex conjugation? Thanks in advance.
accepted
awarded
accepted
comment
Zeroes of complete L-functions
Zen, I see no typo: can't you see the overline on $G$ ?
comment
Zeroes of complete L-functions
When I write "the same zeroes", I mean "the same zeroes with the same multiplicity for $\lambda_{F}$ and $\Lambda_{G}$", so that I don't think it's necessary to assume $F$ and $G$ are primitive.
asked
Loading…
comment
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
Yes indeed, it is just the product of the functions $F_i$.
comment
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
I'm not sure to understand your answer, but isn't the complex conjugation such an automorphism of $\mathcal{S}$ ?
revised
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
added 83 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
revised
Automorphisms of the Selberg class
added 10 characters in body; edited body
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
Abelian varieties and Selberg class
Indeed the word "correspondence" may not fit exactly what I have on my mind, but my English is far from being perfect (I'm French). I didn't know that there were uncountably many functions in S, would you have some reference? By the way, still assuming Selberg's orthonormality conjecture, do both abelian varieties and Selberg's class form semi-simple categories? If so, the concept of functor from abelian varieties into Selberg's class, as you suggested, may be the good way to express my idea.
awarded
asked
Loading…