Skip to main content
anonymous's user avatar
anonymous's user avatar
anonymous's user avatar
anonymous
  • Member for 14 years
  • Last seen more than 7 years ago
  • Berlin, Germany
suggested
Approve
revised
Noncompactness of the Sobolev embedding in the critical exponent case
Whether the operator is condensing is the wrong question (it would start to make sense once we compose it with something to form a self-map)
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Noncompactness of the Sobolev embedding in the critical exponent case
Use more standard/modern notation; see e.g. Appell's summary article on the topic
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Noncompactness of the Sobolev embedding in the critical exponent case
deleted 8 characters in body; added 12 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
revised
Loading…
awarded
comment
Loading…
awarded
comment
Examples of theorems with proofs that have dramatically improved over time
D. J. Newman's A simple proof of Wiener's $ 1/f$ theorem from 1975 seems so simple, I would be surprised if it could be made any simpler: ams.org/journals/proc/1975-048-01/S0002-9939-1975-0365002-8
awarded
comment
Noncompactness of the Sobolev embedding in the critical exponent case
I had already asked this question on math.stackexchange.com a long time ago (without receiving a reply or even a comment), when I had not looked into the issue properly myself.