Skip to main content
13 votes

Is it possible to do calculus and differential geometry the old school way, without any ortho frames or axis?

I do think you're asking a reasonable question, but many do not like your way of asking it. It would be better received if you could express it more rigorously and mathematically and showed that you ...
Deane Yang's user avatar
  • 27.5k
10 votes
Accepted

Properties that only Lorentzian manifolds have

A pseudo-Riemannian manifold of signature $(p,q)$ with $p, q\geq 2$ certainly does not admit Cauchy hypersurfaces, since spacelike submanifolds have dimension at most $p$. However, you could define a ...
10 votes
Accepted

Definition of the conformal metric

Let $(M,[g])$ be a conformal manifold; i.e. $(M,g)$ is a Riemannian manifold and $[g] = \{ u^2g \mathrel{}:\mathrel{} u \in C^\infty(M), u>0 \}$ is the set of Riemannian metrics conformal to $g$. ...
Jeffrey Case's user avatar
  • 1,713
10 votes
Accepted

Understanding exterior differential systems

Here's an expansion of my comment that the natural formulation of this problem as an EDS is on the coframe bundle $\pi: P\to M$, which, I hope, will be helpful. Also, because it will match my usual ...
Robert Bryant's user avatar
8 votes

Lorentzian analogue to Thurston geometries

Both questions are answered here: Dumitrescu, Sorin; Zeghib, Abdelghani, Three-dimensional Lorentz geometries: Classification and completeness, Geom. Dedicata 149, 243-273 (2010). ZBL1216.53025.
Ian Agol's user avatar
  • 68.8k
8 votes
Accepted

Diagonalization of symmetric matrices of functions

In general, this cannot be done. For example, in dimension $2$ in coordinates $(x,y)$, let $$ G(x,y) = \left[\begin{matrix}x&y\\y&-x\end{matrix}\right]. $$ If $G$ could be diagonalized by a ...
Robert Bryant's user avatar
7 votes

Properties that only Lorentzian manifolds have

The reverse Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: for any two causal vectors (orientation in this `squared' formulation is not relevant) $v, w$ we have $$ \vert g(v,w)\vert^2\ge g(v,v) g(w,w) $$ is false in ...
6 votes
Accepted

Conformal equivalence degenerate metric tensors

In order to define an actual Weyl or Cotton tensor, one has to have a non-degenerate conformal structure. In the OP's case, we aren't given such a structure, so the only way to get an actual Weyl or ...
Robert Bryant's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

$(M,g)$ is complete iff $(\tilde{M},\tilde{g})$ is complete (non-Riemannian version)

Completeness of a pseudo-Riemannian manifold (or a manifold with affine connection, more generally) means precisely the completeness of its geodesic flow on its tangent bundle. But the tangent bundle ...
Ben McKay's user avatar
  • 26.3k
5 votes

Is it possible to do calculus and differential geometry the old school way, without any ortho frames or axis?

It's possible to do differential geometry in a purely intrinsic way, at least once you've gotten past the initial hurdle of defining what a manifold is. The standard definition of a manifold is a ...
Gabe K's user avatar
  • 6,001
4 votes
Accepted

Tensor Field Decomposition in Space time

The class of Lorentzian manifolds that is best suited for this kind of question is that of globally hyperbolic ones. Analyzing the space of solutions of a hyperbolic PDE that does not satisfy an ...
Igor Khavkine's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Induced connection on null hypersurfaces

The simple answer is: You can't project to a null hypersurface This is tied to the fact that the "Lorentzian normal" vector field is in fact a tangent vector field. In more details: Start with ...
Willie Wong's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Possible mistake in classification of marginally trapped submanifolds of $\Bbb R^{n+2}_{p+1}$

The proof of the forward implication is perhaps more complicated than necessary, but it is true. The proof of the reverse implication is wrong. In fact here's a counterexample. Consider the space $\...
Willie Wong's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Closed Semi-Riemannian manifolds with non-compact isometry group

Of course there is D’Ambra's 1988 paper "Isometry groups of Lorentz manifolds", from which the theorem you state is taken. A later paper, taking a more general perspective, is this one by D’Ambra and ...
Uri Bader's user avatar
  • 11.6k
4 votes
Accepted

A question on Levi-Civita connection and a fixed hyper surface

Not a full answer, but there definitely should be some integrability constraint. Take the simplest case where $M = \mathbb{R}^3$ (the boundary is unimportant for the discussion here) and $\Sigma$ is ...
Willie Wong's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

A question on null geodesics in Lorentzian geometry

We argue by contradiction. Suppose there are infinitely intersections. By reversing time orientation if necessary, there exists a monotonically increasing sequence of times $s_n \in I$ such that at ...
Willie Wong's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Smoothness of conformal transformations

Answers to your question are somewhat dimension and signature dependent. For example, in dimension $2$, if $g$ is definite, then every $C^1$ conformal diffeomorphism is, in fact, real-analytic, ...
Robert Bryant's user avatar
4 votes

Usage/Application of Raychaudhuri equation in Riemann geometry or pure maths

For any 1-form $\omega$ on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, the product rule and commutation identity say that $$\omega^p\nabla_p\nabla_q\omega^q-\nabla^q(\omega^p\nabla_p\omega_q)=-\omega^p\omega^qR_{pq}...
Quarto Bendir's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Is any globally-hyperbolic manifold conformally equivalent to one with complete slices?

This is the original Nomizu-Ozeki article: Nomizu, Katsumi; Ozeki, Hideki, The existence of complete Riemannian metrics, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 12, 889-891 (1961). ZBL0102.16401. Applying their proof ...
Igor Khavkine's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Metric with a constant Chern–Pontryagin scalar

I found a solution: \begin{equation} g_{\mu\nu} = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} \frac{A}{(1-t z)^2 (x y-1)^2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -\frac{A}{(1-t z)^2 (x y-1)^2} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 &...
Michał Jan's user avatar
3 votes

Usage/Application of Raychaudhuri equation in Riemann geometry or pure maths

The Bochner identity is a special case of the Raychaudhuri equation, obtained when the vector field is of gradient type. Let $v$ be a vector field and let $a^\alpha=v^\alpha{}_{;\beta} v^\beta$ be its ...
Ettore Minguzzi's user avatar
3 votes

Why are they called "screen" distributions?

The word "screen" refers to lightlike dimensional reductions, a worldline in $(d+1)+1$ dimensional space-time is projected onto the screen $x^{d+1}=0$ and the projected $d+1$ dimensional curve is ...
Carlo Beenakker's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Why are they called "screen" distributions?

Naturally, one should consider the quotient space $V/{\rm rad}(V)$ which consists of ${\rm rad}(V)$-rays (affine spaces parallel to ${\rm rad}(V)$). A screen space $SV$ intersects a ray in exactly one ...
Peter Michor's user avatar
  • 25.3k
3 votes

Is any globally-hyperbolic manifold conformally equivalent to one with complete slices?

The answer by Igor is complete and very clear. Although I'd like to give a much shorter one: Yes! Miguel Sánchez actually answers this himself in [1, Section 3.2] [1] Sánchez https://arxiv.org/abs/...
sburgos's user avatar
  • 61
2 votes

Limit of curvature near lightlike points

I think your conjecture is correct (assuming that "regular" means "smooth"), with one possible caveat that I'll mention below. Since curvature is independent of parametrization, without loss of ...
Jeanne Clelland's user avatar
2 votes

How do we calculate the gradient of this function defined using the Riemannian logarithm on a Riemannian manifold?

In order to differentiate something containing the logarithm, it's best if you can differentiate the logarithm itself. And because you work in a neighborhood where the exponential map is a ...
Joonas Ilmavirta's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Tensor component calculation

Start by writing $$ \tag{1}\label{1} B_{nn} = \nabla^\mu \nabla^\nu C_{\mu n n \nu} - \frac{1}{2}C_{\mu n n \nu}R^{\mu\nu} . $$ Here I abuse notation to write $\nabla^\mu\nabla^\nu C_{\mu n n \nu} = n^...
Jeffrey Case's user avatar
  • 1,713
1 vote
Accepted

Proof of equivalence between Lie triple systems and totally geodesic submanifolds

Try pages 71 and 72 of Cartan's "La géométrie des groupes de transformations" https://eudml.org/doc/235668
alvarezpaiva's user avatar
  • 13.5k
1 vote
Accepted

A question on light cones in Lorentzian manifolds with timelike boundary

Edit: Right now I will not give a complete argument in what follows (the previous version of the answer missed the part of the question asking for $S$ to be the boundary of a spacelike hypersurface in ...
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible