Skip to main content
6 votes

Should you bet in poker against Darth Vader?

Getting all-in while behind It is not just when you are ahead that you might want to get all-in against someone who has an information advantage. Suppose the pot is $1$ and the effective stack depth ...
Douglas Zare's user avatar
4 votes

Does the optimal strategy converge in poker if the SPR tends to infinity?

The Clairvoyant Game Here is a well-known toy problem (the Clairvoyant Game) that doesn't converge: Suppose your hand is face-up. You have no hidden information. You don't know whether your opponent'...
Douglas Zare's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Should you bet in poker against Darth Vader?

Here is an answer to the updated question: Suppose that there are two betting rounds. Darth Vader has three types of hands. Type 1 wins with probability 1. Type 2 is a draw that hits (becomes a ...
Douglas Zare's user avatar
2 votes

Does the optimal strategy converge in poker if the SPR tends to infinity?

There is one failure of literal convergence. Consider a situation in the final round of betting where both players have the nuts, i.e. a hand that could not possibly lose, could only win or chop. Then ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 148k
1 vote

Equilibrium strategy for half-street [0,1] poker game, no-limit (from "The mathematics of poker")

I just encountered this, and you're right: Y prefers bluffing to checking for all bluffs below the threshold. It's pretty simple to prove this: for y_a and y_b below the bluffing threshold with y_a &...
Stephen Mills's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible