6
votes
Should you bet in poker against Darth Vader?
Getting all-in while behind
It is not just when you are ahead that you might want to get all-in against someone who has an information advantage. Suppose the pot is $1$ and the effective stack depth ...
4
votes
Does the optimal strategy converge in poker if the SPR tends to infinity?
The Clairvoyant Game
Here is a well-known toy problem (the Clairvoyant Game) that doesn't converge: Suppose your hand is face-up. You have no hidden information. You don't know whether your opponent'...
3
votes
Accepted
Should you bet in poker against Darth Vader?
Here is an answer to the updated question:
Suppose that there are two betting rounds. Darth Vader has three types of hands. Type 1 wins with probability 1. Type 2 is a draw that hits (becomes a ...
2
votes
Does the optimal strategy converge in poker if the SPR tends to infinity?
There is one failure of literal convergence. Consider a situation in the final round of betting where both players have the nuts, i.e. a hand that could not possibly lose, could only win or chop. Then ...
1
vote
Equilibrium strategy for half-street [0,1] poker game, no-limit (from "The mathematics of poker")
I just encountered this, and you're right: Y prefers bluffing to checking for all bluffs below the threshold. It's pretty simple to prove this: for y_a and y_b below the bluffing threshold with y_a &...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible