Skip to main content
36 votes
Accepted

Is every commutative ring a limit of noetherian rings?

The answer is no to all questions except 4. Negative answers to 1,2 and 3: It is easy to construct a ring $A$ with an element $a$ satisfying: (i) $a≠0$, (ii) $a$ is nilpotent, (iii) for each $n≥1$...
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
25 votes
Accepted

Shapes for category theory

I think focusing on graphs is not a good idea. We focus on functors for very good reasons. Here are a few: Many diagrams which are used in practice are functors between categories, and forgetting ...
23 votes

Is there a useful limit or co-limit of a diagram that has only a single object?

One example: Let $X$ be a set with a group $G$ acting on it. Consider the diagram, in the category of sets, with $X$ as its only object, but with all the elements of $G$ (considered as permutations of ...
Andreas Blass's user avatar
23 votes

Conceptual reason that monadic functors create limits?

The heart of the diagram chase is: All the operations and equations involved in an algebra structure on X have target X. (More generally: the target of each operation/equation could be any limit-...
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's user avatar
22 votes
Accepted

Does a fully faithful functor always preserve limits and colimits?

The forgetful functor from abelian groups to groups is fully faithful, and does not preserve coproducts. For example, in abelian groups, $\mathbb Z\coprod \mathbb Z=\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$, but in ...
Alex Mine's user avatar
  • 476
17 votes
Accepted

Defining abstract varieties and their morphisms over a finitely generated subfield of the base field

This is treated (in much greater generality) in EGA IV$_3$, Théorème 8.8.2. The existence of $X_0$ and $Y_0$ follows from part (ii), whereas the existence of $f_0$ is part (i). References. [EGA IV$...
R. van Dobben de Bruyn's user avatar
17 votes
Accepted

Do filtered colimits commute with finite limits in the category of pointed sets?

Yes, filtered colimits commute with finite limits in the category of pointed sets. This is because the forgetful functor from the category of pointed sets to the category of sets creates finite limits ...
Alexander Campbell's user avatar
15 votes

Cofinality for coends?

A sufficient condition for a functor $u:I\to J$ to induce a cofinal functor $Tw(I)\to Tw(J)$ is that $u$ is universally cofinal (i.e. any base change of $u$ is cofinal). Another sufficient condition ...
D.-C. Cisinski's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Is there a large colimit-sketch for topological spaces?

The answer is no. I think this example illustrates why pure colimit sketches are rarely studied; one generally allows limits into the sketch before generalizing to allow colimits into the sketch. That ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 63.9k
14 votes
Accepted

Calculating limits progressively

Let me try to turn my comments into an answer (I think it's also essentially what Vladimir was saying). Suppose you have some diagram $F: K \to \mathcal{C}$. To compute the limit of $F$ is the same as ...
Dylan Wilson's user avatar
  • 13.5k
14 votes

Shapes for category theory

On questions 1 and 2: how would you handle reflexive coequalizers with the graphs-as-shapes approach? I agree that it can be done, but isn't it more natural with categories as shapes? On question 3: ...
13 votes

Is every commutative ring a limit of noetherian rings?

Binary coproducts do not always exist in $\textrm{Noeth}$. Assume that the coproduct $C=\overline{\mathbb{Q}} \sqcup \overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ exists in $\textrm{Noeth}$. Letting $A=\overline{\mathbb{Q}}...
François Brunault's user avatar
13 votes

Do filtered colimits commute with finite limits in the category of pointed sets?

I find it sometimes useful to remember that the stated commutation property holds in any ind-category. Pointed sets is ind-(finite pointed sets). Of course, to verify your particular case by hand, ...
Tilman's user avatar
  • 6,162
13 votes
Accepted

Original reference for categories of presheaves as free cocompletions of small categories

The earliest reference I can find to the universal property of the presheaf construction is Proposition 9.1 of André's Categories of Functors and Adjoint Functors (1966). There is an earlier reference ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
13 votes
Accepted

Homotopy groups of categories of elements as higher colimits

To answer these questions, the best is to note that $|\int_C D|$, the geometric realization of this total category, is equivalently the colimit of $D$, viewed as a functor with values in the $\infty$-...
Maxime Ramzi's user avatar
  • 15.8k
12 votes
Accepted

Existence of homotopy limits and colimits in model categories

Let me start first answering your second question (this is quite close to the idea of John Klein). Definition. A pair $(\mathbf C,\mathcal W)$, with $\mathbf C$ a category and $\mathcal W$ a class of ...
Simone Virili's user avatar
12 votes
Accepted

What's the intuition for weighted limits?

In enriched category theory, weighted limits may be strictly more general than conical limits, in the sense that an enriched category with all conical limits may fail to have all weighted limits. ...
Zhen Lin's user avatar
  • 15.9k
12 votes
Accepted

Why isn't pullback-stability defined for individual colimits but for colimits with the same shape?

Pullback-stability is sometimes considered for individual colimits, or at least, smaller classes than “all colimits of shape $D$”. However, it’s most often used in settings where it holds for large ...
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's user avatar
11 votes

Is there a tricategory of bicategories and biprofunctors?

For those coming across this question more recently, there is now an answer to the original question. In fact, the tricategory of pseudoprofunctors has been defined twice, independently, via different ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
11 votes
Accepted

Cocomplete and finitely complete category with nice pullbacks that is not locally presentable

If you look at the article on quasitoposes, which are locally cartesian closed and therefore satisfy your exactness condition, you'll find a number of examples that are not locally presentable. For ...
Todd Trimble's user avatar
  • 53.3k
11 votes
Accepted

Ferrand pushouts for algebraic stacks

Yes, this is exactly Theorem A.4 in my old preprint Compactification of tame Deligne–Mumford stacks which is long overdue to appear on the arXiv. The proof is rather terse but fairly standard (compare ...
David Rydh's user avatar
  • 5,039
11 votes
Accepted

Does Grothendieck's algebraization imply existence of colimits of schemes?

Here's one way to see what's going on. I will use the Tannakian duality theorem of Hall and Rydh (see Theorem 1.1 here). It is stated for algebraic stacks, but if you replace the word "algebraic ...
David Benjamin Lim's user avatar
11 votes

Filling square to push-out in abelian category

If there is such a pushout, then $B\to D$ is also a monomorphism, i.e. $B$ is a subobject of $D$. Phrased more concretely, you're asking when there is a subobject $B$ of $D$ such that $B+C = D$ and $B\...
Maxime Ramzi's user avatar
  • 15.8k
11 votes

Shapes for category theory

Here are some leads for 1. and 2. (this is far from a full answer, but slightly too long for a comment). I only went in the "disadvantages of this approach" direction, too so that's another ...
11 votes
Accepted

Finite coproducts commute with which limits in Set?

Indeed, let $D$ be a category. The canonical functor $D \to \pi_0(D)$ is both cofinal and coinitial. Therefore, if finite coproducts commute with $D$-limits in a category $\mathcal C$, then finite ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 63.9k
11 votes
Accepted

Does the category of locally compact Hausdorff spaces with proper maps have products?

Suppose $X,Y$ are locally compact Hausdorff spaces admitting a product $X\otimes Y$ in the category $\mathcal{H}$ of all such spaces. If one of $X,Y$ is empty, then $X\otimes Y$ exists, so I'll assume ...
Tyrone's user avatar
  • 5,596
10 votes

Defining abstract varieties and their morphisms over a finitely generated subfield of the base field

A variety $V$ is a finite union of open affine varieties $V_i$, and because $V$ is separated (usually part of the definition of variety) the intersections $V_i\cap V_j$ are also affine. Now $V$ can be ...
anon's user avatar
  • 101
10 votes
Accepted

Behaviour of direct limit with matrices

You’re asking whether the functor $M_2$ on Banach spaces preserves colimits of direct sequences. (In case you’re not familiar with the categorical terminology I’m using here, don’t be put off — it’s ...
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's user avatar
10 votes

Colimits in the category of (not necessarily locally convex) topological vector spaces

I found a construction of the coproduct in the category of topological abelian groups from this reference: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82771298.pdf, which can be also applied to the category of ...
Junekey Jeon's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Colimits in the category of (not necessarily locally convex) topological vector spaces

The Springer Lecture Notes 639 Topological Vector Spaces of Adasch, Ernst, and Keim contain in § 4 a more or less explicit construction of inductive (=co-) limits in the category of topological vector ...
Jochen Wengenroth's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible