4
votes
Simple proof that exactness implies strong mixing
I think the martingale theory really captures exactly what's happening. I don't know any other proof, but suspect that you would end up reproducing the backwards martingale theorem in some form? I am ...
4
votes
Simple proof that exactness implies strong mixing
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, and I'm not an expert on exact systems, but:
your definition of exact implies that $\bigcap_{n \geq 0} T^{-n} \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{N}$, where $\mathcal{B}...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
ds.dynamical-systems × 2389ergodic-theory × 490
reference-request × 283
differential-equations × 215
dg.differential-geometry × 209
ca.classical-analysis-and-odes × 144
nt.number-theory × 133
symbolic-dynamics × 124
fa.functional-analysis × 115
pr.probability × 115
measure-theory × 87
riemannian-geometry × 85
complex-dynamics × 83
gn.general-topology × 81
mp.mathematical-physics × 80
gr.group-theory × 78
real-analysis × 75
foliations × 74
mg.metric-geometry × 67
gt.geometric-topology × 64
sg.symplectic-geometry × 64
ap.analysis-of-pdes × 63
cv.complex-variables × 58
discrete-dynamical-systems × 57
stability × 55