New answers tagged

3 votes

Weakest theory over which "all sets are measurable" has consistency strength?

This is more of an extended comment than an answer, but I think it's an important point to make. Also, as I discuss at the end it is technically an answer. You are never going to have a constructively ...
James Hanson's user avatar
  • 9,179
6 votes
Accepted

Does negative trichotomy hold for constructive ordinals?

I'll assume by ordinal you mean a set with a transitive, well-founded, and extensional relation. Then it's not constructively valid that $\neg \neg (A < B \vee A = B \vee A > B)$ for ordinals $A$...
David Wärn's user avatar
2 votes

Does negative trichotomy hold for constructive ordinals?

It's three decades since I wrote Intuitionistic Sets and Ordinals, at which time I knew how to express well founded relations as coalgebras, but I had very little understanding of the subject. In ...
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 7,731
6 votes
Accepted

In the constructive theory of direct categories, is it decidable whether an arbitrary morphism is an identity or not?

I believe (2) is the best definition. Consider what you want to do with a direct category: you want to construct presheaves and natural transformations between them inductively, assuming that they ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 63.7k
4 votes

In the constructive theory of direct categories, is it decidable whether an arbitrary morphism is an identity or not?

To ask whether it is decidable if a morphism is an identity is the wrong question here. In any more general setting the answer to this ought to be "no", however, here we don't have any non-...
Arno's user avatar
  • 4,056

Top 50 recent answers are included