Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
-4
votes
1
answer
352
views
Can there be such an elementary embedding?
EDIT: it appears that my original question has some confusion between auto-morphisms and elementary embeddings as it is obvious from the answer below, therefore I'll clarify here what I exactly want.
…
3
votes
1
answer
426
views
What is the consistency strength of this kind of reflection principle?
If $\psi$ is a predicate that is definable in $FOL(\in,=)$ by a formula from parameters in $V$, then if $\psi$ hold of the class $\small ORD$ of all ordinals in $V$, then the class of all cardinals in …
1
vote
1
answer
323
views
What is the limit to iterating class comprehension, reflection and limitation of size?
In posting about a reflection principle coupled with a limitation of size axiom over Ackermann set theory, the answer is that the theory is blown up to a Mahlo cardinal.
I'm here just wondering if th …
1
vote
1
answer
660
views
Can Ackermann set theory find a natural interpretation in light\heavy class dichotomy?
I want to coin the notion of heaviness of a class as a function from classes to ordinals such that $$heaviness(x)=|TC(x)|$$, i.e. the heaviness of a class is the cardinality of its transitive closure. …
0
votes
1
answer
1k
views
What is the consistency status of this theory?
Let $K_2^+(W)$ be the following theory in the language $L(\in,W)$ with the constant symbol $W$.
Extensionality: $\forall x (x \in a \leftrightarrow x \in b) \to a=b$
$\mathcal{Define:} \ set(x) \iff …
0
votes
0
answers
178
views
Can second order ordinal arithmetic be extended to the same extent as ZFC?
In a prior posting, I've posed the idea of reducing set theory to an extended kind of second order ordinal arithmetic $\small \sf`` 2 oO A"$. The idea was to have a domain of ordinals and sets of ordi …
0
votes
0
answers
117
views
What's the consistency strength of this theory of Stretchable Hierarchies?
Working in Morse-Kelley set theory:
A hierarchy is defined as a class that is the union of sets uniquely indexed by ordinals, called as stages, such that each stage is the power set of the immediatel …
-1
votes
1
answer
367
views
What is the consistency strength of adding this ordinal reflection scheme on top of Ackerman...
Axiom scheme of Ordinal Reflection: if $\phi$ is a formula that doesn't use the symbol $V$, whose parameters are among $x_1,..,x_n$; then: $$\forall x_1 \in V,\dotsc,\forall x_n \in V: \phi(On) \to \\ …
0
votes
0
answers
275
views
Can this Ackermann like set theory formulated without adding a primitive of set-hood reach t...
The following is a theory that uses a reflection principle similar to Ackermann but on a size notion that is definable in the language of set theory, my question is about its consistency strength real …
1
vote
0
answers
99
views
Are those two theories equivalent?
Lets denote any set that is "the set of all strictly smaller subsets of it" as size- unreachable. Formally: $$\operatorname {size-unreachable}(X) \iff \\\forall Y (Y \in X \iff Y \subset X \land |Y|<| …
1
vote
0
answers
112
views
What's the consistency strength of adding this inference rule to Ackermann's set theory?
Working in the language of Ackermann set theory:
Let $\phi(\vec{P},\vec{x})$ be a formula not using the symbol $V$, where $\vec{P}$ are predicate symbols definable in the language of set theory, and $ …
1
vote
1
answer
137
views
Would loss of downward absoluteness for large cardinals repeat itself upwardly?
if $\kappa$ is a cardinal such that $V_\kappa \models \sf ZFC$, then $\kappa$ is called a worldly cardinal and this is not necessarily downward absolute [Hamkins], i.e. there is a model $V$ of $\sf ZF …
1
vote
1
answer
410
views
Why the restrictions in the definition of Berkeley cardinals?
A cardinal κ is a Berkeley cardinal, if for any transitive set $M$ with $κ∈M$ and any ordinal $α<κ$ there is an elementary embedding $j : M → M$ with $\alpha<\text{crit}(j)<\kappa$.
My question i …
-2
votes
1
answer
128
views
Is the principle of indifference of hierarchical construction consistent? What's its consist...
Sometimes when one tries to capture the abstract aspect of some notion that is intuitively considered as being truly of abstract nature, in set theoretic terms, then this can extend the theory in a hu …
-1
votes
1
answer
132
views
What is the strength of claiming that the class of all $V_\kappa$ stages that are $H_\kappa$...
[EDIT] This posting had been edited to assert that we are speaking about regular mutual stages.
Let $H_{\kappa}$ be the set of all sets that are hereditarily strictly smaller in cardinality than car …