Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
The representation of functions (or objects which are in some generalize the notion of function) as constant linear combinations of sines and cosines at integer multiples of a given frequency, as Fourier transforms or as Fourier integrals.
7
votes
Support of function and support of its Fourier transform
This is a delayed answer, but it seems good to clarify what the OP is asking. This kind of statements: "since $f$ is concentrated in such a ball then its Fourier transform is essentially concentrated …
1
vote
Accepted
On a paper by Adams and Frazier
I'm not quite confident about what I'll write, but I think that there is an issue here. I haven't read the paper, but I'd suggest the following amendment:
By Hölder, with exponents $q$ and $q'$, to b …
0
votes
Fourier support condition in the paper 'A study guide for the $l^2$ decoupling theorem'
For any function $f$, since $\hat{f}(x,y,z)=\int f(\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3)e(-\langle (x,y,z), \xi\rangle)\,d\xi$, for fixed $y$ we have that the function $(x,z)\mapsto \hat{f}(x,y,z)$ is the Fourier transf …
2
votes
Accepted
Idea behind Carleson's theorem modern proof "intitial reductions"
I have my own confusions here, but let me share my thoughts.
As you mention, there is a discretization here. If you want to decompose the operator $P_-$, you use the standard decomposition $\sum_k\ha …