Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
2
votes
Does an analytic continuation for a particular Leibniz series exist?
For $0 < |z| < 1$ and $\Re(s) > 1$
$$F(s,z) = \Gamma(s)\sum_{n=1}^\infty z^n n^{-s} =\int_0^\infty x^{s-1} \sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-nx} z^n dx= \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x/z-1}dx$$
$$= \frac{ x^s …
6
votes
Are lacunary functions still lacunary over rings larger than $\mathbb{C}$?
$f:M_k(\Bbb{C})\to M_k(\Bbb{C})$ is analytic on $\{ A\in M_k(\Bbb{C}),\sigma(A)<1\}$ and not beyond, where $\sigma(A)=\sup |\lambda_j(A)|$ is the spectral radius.
If $\sigma(A)< 1$ then write the J …
1
vote
Numerical evaluation of some series
The binomial series gives a meromorphic continuation of any series of the form $\sum_{n=N}^\infty g(n) f(n)^{-s}$ for some polynomials $g(x) = \sum_{j=0}^t c_j x^j$ and $f(x) = x^r \prod_{k=1}^d (x-a_ …
1
vote
Continuing an analytic continuation of the Dirichlet $\eta$-function?
I abandoned making a precise answer but for a continuous branch of $(N+1/2 +ix)^{-s}$, $F_N(s)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{(N+1/2 +ix)^{-s}}{\cosh(\pi x)}\,dx$ converges and is analytic for $\Im(s …
4
votes
Accepted
Analytic extension of the Hurwitz ζ function
Summing by parts, using the binomial series and inverting the double sum works fine, obtaining
$$\zeta(s,a)-s \zeta(s,N)
= \sum_{n=1}^{N-1} n ((n+a-1)^{-s}-(n+a)^{-s})\\+ \sum_{k=0}^\infty {-s \cho …
-2
votes
On infinite sum containing logarithmic derivative of Zeta function and Möbius function:
Your question doesn't make much sense. Let $a_d =\sum_{m|d} \mu(m) \frac{e^{-(d/m)/2}}{d/m}=O(1)$. As $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}=O(2^{-s})$ then for $\Re(s) >0$, $F(s) = \sum_{d\ge 1} a_d\frac{\zeta' …