Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with kt.k-theory-and-homology
Search options not deleted
user 82627
Algebraic and topological K-theory, relations with topology, commutative algebra, and operator algebras
1
vote
Accepted
Why is the flat cotorsion pair actually a cotorsion pair?
The category of sheaves on a ringed space is a Grothendieck category. Let $Q$ denote an injective cogenerator. We write $hom$ for internal and $Hom$ for external hom.
Let $F^+:=hom(F,Q)$. Then for an …
- 501
1
vote
2
answers
201
views
Why is the flat cotorsion pair actually a cotorsion pair?
I asked this question some while ago on Stack Exchange but didn't get an answer (link), so I am trying it here as well.
Fix a ringed space $(X,\mathcal{O})$ and denote by $\mathcal{F}$ the class of f …
- 501