Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 8133

Model theory is the branch of mathematical logic which deals with the connection between a formal language and its interpretations, or models.

11 votes
0 answers
199 views

Is there a decidable theory of arithmetic with a non-collapsing quantifier hierarchy?

This question is very close to this old MSE question of mine, which is still unanswered. Is there an (ideally reasonably-natural!) expansion of the structure $(\mathbb{N};+)$ in a finite language whos …
3 votes
0 answers
109 views

Are the natural powers of two conservatively embedded in $\mathbb{C}$?

This is a followup to this question. Consider $\mathbb{C}$ as a structure - in the sense of first-order logic - with the graphs of addition and multiplication. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be the substructure wi …
15 votes

Are integers conservatively embedded in the field of complex numbers?

I don't know a reference, but here's a (slightly overkill) proof: It's known that $(\mathbb{Z};+,\times)$ interprets an algebraically closed field $K$ of infinite transcendence degree and characterist …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
182 views

Is Presburger arithmetic in stronger logics still complete?

Originally asked at MSE: Let $\Sigma=\{+,<,0,1\}$ be the usual language of Presburger arithmetic. Given a "reasonable" logic $\mathcal{L}$, let $\mathbb{Pres}(\mathcal{L})$ be the $\mathcal{L}$-theory …
46 votes
8 answers
12k views

What are some proofs of Godel's Theorem which are *essentially different* from the original ...

I am looking for examples of proofs of Godel's (First) Incompleteness Theorem which are essentially different from (Rosser's improvement of) Godel's original proof. This is partly inspired by question …
5 votes
1 answer
252 views

What oracles make finding isomorphism (of finite structures) easy?

Below, all structures are finite, in a finite language, with underlying set an initial segment of the natural numbers. This has been edited to fix errors pointed out by Emil Jerabek in his answer belo …
6 votes
0 answers
217 views

Decidably clarifying ordinals

For a computable$^*$ ordinal $\alpha$ (viewed as an $\{<\}$-structure), say that a first-order sentence $\sigma$ in a relational language $\Sigma\supseteq \{<\}$ decidably clarifies $\alpha$ iff $\alp …
6 votes
0 answers
248 views

Whence compactness of automorphism quantifiers?

The following question arose while trying to read Shelah's papers Models with second-order properties I-V. For simplicity, I'm assuming a much stronger theory here than Shelah: throughout, we work in …
21 votes
0 answers
912 views

"Compactness for computability" - does it ever happen?

Throughout, "computable structure" means "first-order structure in a computable language with domain $\omega$ whose atomic diagram is computable." Say that a computable structure $A$ is compact for co …
2 votes
0 answers
191 views

On "necessary connectives" in a structure

Given a clone $\mathcal{C}$ over $\{\top,\perp\}$, let $\mathsf{FOL}^\mathcal{C}$ be the version of first-order logic with connectives from $\mathcal{C}$ in place of the usual Booleans. Given a clone …
6 votes
0 answers
287 views

Do maximal compact logics exist?

By "logic" I mean regular logic in the sense of abstract model theory (see e.g. the last section of Ebbinghaus/Flum/Thomas' book). My question is simple: Is there a logic $\mathcal{L}$ which is fully …
9 votes
1 answer
364 views

Can the canonical Eudoxus-real representatives be defined easily?

(See e.g. here for background on the Eudoxus reals, which motivates this question.) Let $\mathcal{Z}=(\mathbb{Z};+,<)$. Say that a Eudoxus function is an $f:\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}$ such that …
19 votes
Accepted

Is every recursively axiomatizable and consistent theory interpretable in the true arithmeti...

The answer is yes. I believe the following is best attributed to Feferman 1960; more generally, look up "arithmetized completeness theorem" (which is annoyingly different from the arithmetic completen …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
198 views

In finite model theory, is "invariant FOL with $\varepsilon$-operator" unavoidably second-or...

Throughout, all structures are finite. Say that a class of finite structures $\mathbb{K}$ is $\mathsf{FOL}_\varepsilon^\text{inv}$-elementary iff it is the class of finite models of a sentence in the …
5 votes
0 answers
80 views

Which pseudovarieties have (Eilenberg/Schutzenberger) minimal descriptions?

Suppose $\mathscr{V}$ is a pseudovariety in a countable language $\Sigma$. Say that a minimal description of $\mathscr{V}$ (in the sense of Eilenberg/Schutzenberger rather than Reiterman) is a pair $( …

1
2 3 4 5
17
15 30 50 per page