Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Model theory is the branch of mathematical logic which deals with the connection between a formal language and its interpretations, or models.
11
votes
0
answers
199
views
Is there a decidable theory of arithmetic with a non-collapsing quantifier hierarchy?
This question is very close to this old MSE question of mine, which is still unanswered.
Is there an (ideally reasonably-natural!) expansion of the structure $(\mathbb{N};+)$ in a finite language whos …
3
votes
0
answers
109
views
Are the natural powers of two conservatively embedded in $\mathbb{C}$?
This is a followup to this question.
Consider $\mathbb{C}$ as a structure - in the sense of first-order logic - with the graphs of addition and multiplication. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be the substructure wi …
15
votes
Are integers conservatively embedded in the field of complex numbers?
I don't know a reference, but here's a (slightly overkill) proof:
It's known that $(\mathbb{Z};+,\times)$ interprets an algebraically closed field $K$ of infinite transcendence degree and characterist …
7
votes
1
answer
182
views
Is Presburger arithmetic in stronger logics still complete?
Originally asked at MSE:
Let $\Sigma=\{+,<,0,1\}$ be the usual language of Presburger arithmetic. Given a "reasonable" logic $\mathcal{L}$, let $\mathbb{Pres}(\mathcal{L})$ be the $\mathcal{L}$-theory …
46
votes
8
answers
12k
views
What are some proofs of Godel's Theorem which are *essentially different* from the original ...
I am looking for examples of proofs of Godel's (First) Incompleteness Theorem which are essentially different from (Rosser's improvement of) Godel's original proof.
This is partly inspired by question …
5
votes
1
answer
252
views
What oracles make finding isomorphism (of finite structures) easy?
Below, all structures are finite, in a finite language, with underlying set an initial segment of the natural numbers. This has been edited to fix errors pointed out by Emil Jerabek in his answer belo …
6
votes
0
answers
217
views
Decidably clarifying ordinals
For a computable$^*$ ordinal $\alpha$ (viewed as an $\{<\}$-structure), say that a first-order sentence $\sigma$ in a relational language $\Sigma\supseteq \{<\}$ decidably clarifies $\alpha$ iff $\alp …
6
votes
0
answers
248
views
Whence compactness of automorphism quantifiers?
The following question arose while trying to read Shelah's papers Models with second-order properties I-V. For simplicity, I'm assuming a much stronger theory here than Shelah: throughout, we work in …
21
votes
0
answers
912
views
"Compactness for computability" - does it ever happen?
Throughout, "computable structure" means "first-order structure in a computable language with domain $\omega$ whose atomic diagram is computable."
Say that a computable structure $A$ is compact for co …
2
votes
0
answers
191
views
On "necessary connectives" in a structure
Given a clone $\mathcal{C}$ over $\{\top,\perp\}$, let $\mathsf{FOL}^\mathcal{C}$ be the version of first-order logic with connectives from $\mathcal{C}$ in place of the usual Booleans. Given a clone …
6
votes
0
answers
287
views
Do maximal compact logics exist?
By "logic" I mean regular logic in the sense of abstract model theory (see e.g. the last section of Ebbinghaus/Flum/Thomas' book). My question is simple:
Is there a logic $\mathcal{L}$ which is fully …
9
votes
1
answer
364
views
Can the canonical Eudoxus-real representatives be defined easily?
(See e.g. here for background on the Eudoxus reals, which motivates this question.)
Let $\mathcal{Z}=(\mathbb{Z};+,<)$. Say that a Eudoxus function is an $f:\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}$ such that …
19
votes
Accepted
Is every recursively axiomatizable and consistent theory interpretable in the true arithmeti...
The answer is yes. I believe the following is best attributed to Feferman 1960; more generally, look up "arithmetized completeness theorem" (which is annoyingly different from the arithmetic completen …
5
votes
0
answers
198
views
In finite model theory, is "invariant FOL with $\varepsilon$-operator" unavoidably second-or...
Throughout, all structures are finite.
Say that a class of finite structures $\mathbb{K}$ is $\mathsf{FOL}_\varepsilon^\text{inv}$-elementary iff it is the class of finite models of a sentence in the …
5
votes
0
answers
80
views
Which pseudovarieties have (Eilenberg/Schutzenberger) minimal descriptions?
Suppose $\mathscr{V}$ is a pseudovariety in a countable language $\Sigma$. Say that a minimal description of $\mathscr{V}$ (in the sense of Eilenberg/Schutzenberger rather than Reiterman) is a pair $( …