Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 8133
5 votes
1 answer
291 views

Versions of large cardinals with target model in a generic extension

(I ran into this question while thinking about the (Strong) Inner Model Hypothesis: see http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093051 or http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0680.) A measurable cardinal is a cardinal $\k …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
302 views

Cardinal arithmetic in $L(\mathbb{R})$

I asked this on math.stackexchange but did not receive an answer, so I'm asking here. Assume large cardinals. Can we have $\omega_2^{L(\mathbb{R})}=\omega_2$? Note that $\omega_1=\omega_1^{L(\mathbb …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
13 votes
2 answers
726 views

What can the degrees of constructibility be?

If $r, s\in\mathbb{R}$, we say $r$ is constructible relative to $s$ - and write $r\le_cs$ - if $r\in L[s]$. Modding out by the induced equivalence relation $\equiv_c$, we get a partial order, the degr …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
176 views

Weakly compact cardinals in $L$: how long do branches take to appear?

Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZFC+V=L+}$ "There is a weakly compact cardinal," $\kappa$ is the first weakly compact cardinal and "tree" means "subtree of $2^{<\kappa}$ of height $\kappa$" Despite t …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
387 views

"Clubiness" of projective sets of ordinals

I'm sure this is just my google-fu failing me, but: what are sufficient, non-overkill large cardinal axioms which guarantee "Every (boldface) $\Pi^1_n$ set of (real codes for) countable ordinals conta …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
809 views

Can $Ord$ have nontrivial second-order elementary self-embeddings?

I forgot to mention originally: this was motivated by this old MSE question. It's not hard to show in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ that there are nontrivial elementary embeddings from $(Ord; \in)$ to itself - or ra …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
511 views

Analogues of worldly cardinals for (an unusual version of) second-order $\mathsf{ZFC}$

Let $\mathfrak{ZFC}(\mathsf{SOL})$ be the theory in second-order logic (with the standard semantics) gotten from $\mathsf{ZFC}$ by modifying the Separation and Replacement schemes to apply to arbitrar …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
391 views

How similar are large cardinals, over $L$?

EDIT: Joel's answer shows that no $\Sigma_2$ large cardinal property will do the job - however, $\Pi_2$ properties (such as unfoldability and its relatives) may still be useful. Throughout this que …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
307 views

Lowenheim-Skolem numbers for SOL + correctness quantifiers

For a logic $\mathcal{L}$, say that a cardinal $\kappa$ is $\mathcal{L}$-correct iff every satisfiable $\mathcal{L}$-theory of size $<\kappa$ has a model of size $<\kappa$. First-order correctness is …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
365 views

How strong is "all up-classes are infinitarily definable"?

Working in MK (or some other not-too-strong class theory if you prefer), say that an up-class is a class of structures $\mathfrak{X}$ which is definable in $V$ (allowing parameters from $V$) and such …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
183 views

A restricted form of the inner model hypothesis

Previously asked and bountied at MSE, with slight difference. To keep things relatively simple I'm presenting a somewhat-butchered version of the IMH; for more details, see S.-D. Friedman, Internal co …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
239 views

Can there be no complexity bound on the definable elementary $V\rightarrow M$?

This starts with a vaguely-recalled result (which may be false!): that if $\mathcal{U}$ is a measure on the least measurable cardinal $\kappa$, then every elementary $j: L[\mathcal{U}]\rightarrow M$ s …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
178 views

Fragility of large cardinals with respect to transitive end extensions

To motivate things, let me start with a special case of the question I'm interested in. Let $\mathsf{In}(x)\equiv$ "$x$ is an inaccessible cardinal." Question 1: Is it consistent with the theory $$\m …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
201 views

Upwards-fragility of inaccessibles (again)

Although self-contained, this question is a follow-up to this earlier one. Also, thanks to Fedor Pakhomov for fixing a trivial early version of this question! Work in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + "There is a meas …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
402 views

$\infty$-Borel Determinacy?

An $\infty$-Borel set is a set $X\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ which has an $\infty$-Borel code - a set $r$ coding the construction of $X$ via open sets, complementation, and well-ordered unions (see http://en …
Noah Schweber's user avatar

15 30 50 per page