Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
5
votes
1
answer
291
views
Versions of large cardinals with target model in a generic extension
(I ran into this question while thinking about the (Strong) Inner Model Hypothesis: see http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093051 or http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0680.)
A measurable cardinal is a cardinal $\k …
4
votes
1
answer
302
views
Cardinal arithmetic in $L(\mathbb{R})$
I asked this on math.stackexchange but did not receive an answer, so I'm asking here.
Assume large cardinals. Can we have $\omega_2^{L(\mathbb{R})}=\omega_2$?
Note that $\omega_1=\omega_1^{L(\mathbb …
13
votes
2
answers
726
views
What can the degrees of constructibility be?
If $r, s\in\mathbb{R}$, we say $r$ is constructible relative to $s$ - and write $r\le_cs$ - if $r\in L[s]$. Modding out by the induced equivalence relation $\equiv_c$, we get a partial order, the degr …
8
votes
1
answer
176
views
Weakly compact cardinals in $L$: how long do branches take to appear?
Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZFC+V=L+}$ "There is a weakly compact cardinal," $\kappa$ is the first weakly compact cardinal and "tree" means "subtree of $2^{<\kappa}$ of height $\kappa$"
Despite t …
8
votes
2
answers
387
views
"Clubiness" of projective sets of ordinals
I'm sure this is just my google-fu failing me, but: what are sufficient, non-overkill large cardinal axioms which guarantee "Every (boldface) $\Pi^1_n$ set of (real codes for) countable ordinals conta …
16
votes
1
answer
809
views
Can $Ord$ have nontrivial second-order elementary self-embeddings?
I forgot to mention originally: this was motivated by this old MSE question.
It's not hard to show in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ that there are nontrivial elementary embeddings from $(Ord; \in)$ to itself - or ra …
8
votes
2
answers
511
views
Analogues of worldly cardinals for (an unusual version of) second-order $\mathsf{ZFC}$
Let $\mathfrak{ZFC}(\mathsf{SOL})$ be the theory in second-order logic (with the standard semantics) gotten from $\mathsf{ZFC}$ by modifying the Separation and Replacement schemes to apply to arbitrar …
7
votes
1
answer
391
views
How similar are large cardinals, over $L$?
EDIT: Joel's answer shows that no $\Sigma_2$ large cardinal property will do the job - however, $\Pi_2$ properties (such as unfoldability and its relatives) may still be useful.
Throughout this que …
7
votes
1
answer
307
views
Lowenheim-Skolem numbers for SOL + correctness quantifiers
For a logic $\mathcal{L}$, say that a cardinal $\kappa$ is $\mathcal{L}$-correct iff every satisfiable $\mathcal{L}$-theory of size $<\kappa$ has a model of size $<\kappa$. First-order correctness is …
6
votes
1
answer
365
views
How strong is "all up-classes are infinitarily definable"?
Working in MK (or some other not-too-strong class theory if you prefer), say that an up-class is a class of structures $\mathfrak{X}$ which is definable in $V$ (allowing parameters from $V$) and such …
3
votes
0
answers
183
views
A restricted form of the inner model hypothesis
Previously asked and bountied at MSE, with slight difference. To keep things relatively simple I'm presenting a somewhat-butchered version of the IMH; for more details, see S.-D. Friedman, Internal co …
6
votes
1
answer
239
views
Can there be no complexity bound on the definable elementary $V\rightarrow M$?
This starts with a vaguely-recalled result (which may be false!): that if $\mathcal{U}$ is a measure on the least measurable cardinal $\kappa$, then every elementary $j: L[\mathcal{U}]\rightarrow M$ s …
5
votes
1
answer
178
views
Fragility of large cardinals with respect to transitive end extensions
To motivate things, let me start with a special case of the question I'm interested in. Let $\mathsf{In}(x)\equiv$ "$x$ is an inaccessible cardinal."
Question 1: Is it consistent with the theory $$\m …
5
votes
1
answer
201
views
Upwards-fragility of inaccessibles (again)
Although self-contained, this question is a follow-up to this earlier one. Also, thanks to Fedor Pakhomov for fixing a trivial early version of this question!
Work in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + "There is a meas …
6
votes
0
answers
402
views
$\infty$-Borel Determinacy?
An $\infty$-Borel set is a set $X\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ which has an $\infty$-Borel code - a set $r$ coding the construction of $X$ via open sets, complementation, and well-ordered unions (see http://en …