Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 8133
3 votes

Vopěnka cardinals

I believe the answer is "yes" - $V_\lambda$ can compute $\varphi^{V_\kappa}$ for every formula $\varphi$ (since the full truth predicate for $V_\kappa$ lives already at around $V_{\kappa+2}$ or so), a …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

What is known about $\Pi_1^0$-Indescribable cardinals?

A $\Pi_1$ statement $\varphi$ is absolute downwards between transitive structures: if $(V_\alpha; \in, A)\models\varphi$ and $\beta<\alpha$, then $(V_\beta;\in, A\cap V_\beta)\models\varphi$. So $\Pi^ …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Can there be such an elementary embedding?

EDIT: Based on the comments, I think it's worth clarifying a bit of the nature of the Boffa-Jensen construction of a model of NFU (which appears to be part of the motivation for this question). In th …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Possible inconsistency related to embeddings $j: M\prec V$

There is no contradiction here. Look at Theorem $2.3$: Suppose $I\subseteq On$ witnesses $On$ is Ramsey. Then, definably over $\langle V,\in, I\rangle$, there is a transitive class $M$, and an …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes

Large cardinals and elementary embeddings for infinitary languages

This is extremely sketchy since I have to run, but I'll fill in the details later: I think if $j$ comes from a measurable - more generally, if $M^\kappa\subseteq M$ - then we already have $\mathcal{L …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Proving that being an inaccessible cardinal is absolute, for $V_\kappa$, where $\kappa$ is i...

Since this is really just a question about absoluteness, let me leave inaccessibility behind for the moment and focus on a simpler still-interesting example: cardinal-ness. Suppose $\alpha$ is an ord …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

What is the least inaccessible cardinal for Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?

I missed the inaccessibility requirement initially - fixed! Since $\mathsf{TG}$ is "just" $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + "There is a proper class of inaccessible cardinals," an inaccessible $\alpha$ satisfies $V_\a …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes

How can the critical point of an elementary embedding be omega_1?

Indeed, you cannot have an elementary embedding $j:V\rightarrow M$ with critical point $\omega_1^V$. However, there are some subtleties to keep in mind: We could have an elementary embedding $j:W\ri …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Separation of large cardinal notions

Let me argue that Kunen's argument actually shows the best possible thing here. First, let's think about consistency results. The "ideal" result here would be: (i) Con(ZFC) implies Con(ZFC + "The …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes

Elementary submodels of V

Two comments on this: First, it's not clear that one can formulate "there exists a transitive set $S\in V$ such that $S\prec V$" in first-order logic, so it's a bit tricky to phrase your question pre …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

smallest ordinal $\alpha$ such that $L \cap P(L_\alpha)$ is uncountable

Really, this was answered in the comments; I'm putting this answer down to move this off the unanswered queue. I've made this CW and will delete it if one of the original commenters adds their own ans …
5 votes
Accepted

Why the restrictions in the definition of Berkeley cardinals?

Dropping transitivity doesn't actually add anything: given $M\supseteq\kappa$, just consider $\hat{M}=$ the Mostowski collapse of $M$. Given $\alpha<\kappa$ and $j:\hat{M}\rightarrow \hat{M}$ nontrivi …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Is the principle of indifference of hierarchical construction consistent? What's its consist...

This question can be more clearly phrased as: Is the principle "We can iterate powerset along any (definable) class-well-ordering" (which is really a scheme, appropriately) consistent with ZFC? …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes

Would loss of downward absoluteness for large cardinals repeat itself upwardly?

It depends on the large cardinal property. For example, inaccessibility is downwards-absolute: if $V\models$ "$\kappa$ is inaccessible" and $W$ is an inner model of $V$ then $W\models$ "$\kappa$ is in …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
9 votes

Operations on the set of large cardinal axioms

At least for Mahlo-ness, things are pretty simple to describe: Given a property $P(\kappa)$ of cardinals implying strong inaccessibility, let $P^{\mathrm{Mahlo}}(\kappa)$ be the property "$\kappa$ ha …
Noah Schweber's user avatar

15 30 50 per page