Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
3
votes
Vopěnka cardinals
I believe the answer is "yes" - $V_\lambda$ can compute $\varphi^{V_\kappa}$ for every formula $\varphi$ (since the full truth predicate for $V_\kappa$ lives already at around $V_{\kappa+2}$ or so), a …
5
votes
Accepted
What is known about $\Pi_1^0$-Indescribable cardinals?
A $\Pi_1$ statement $\varphi$ is absolute downwards between transitive structures: if $(V_\alpha; \in, A)\models\varphi$ and $\beta<\alpha$, then $(V_\beta;\in, A\cap V_\beta)\models\varphi$. So $\Pi^ …
2
votes
Accepted
Can there be such an elementary embedding?
EDIT: Based on the comments, I think it's worth clarifying a bit of the nature of the Boffa-Jensen construction of a model of NFU (which appears to be part of the motivation for this question).
In th …
4
votes
Accepted
Possible inconsistency related to embeddings $j: M\prec V$
There is no contradiction here.
Look at Theorem $2.3$:
Suppose $I\subseteq On$ witnesses $On$ is Ramsey. Then, definably
over $\langle V,\in, I\rangle$, there is a transitive class $M$, and an …
2
votes
Large cardinals and elementary embeddings for infinitary languages
This is extremely sketchy since I have to run, but I'll fill in the details later:
I think if $j$ comes from a measurable - more generally, if $M^\kappa\subseteq M$ - then we already have $\mathcal{L …
5
votes
Accepted
Proving that being an inaccessible cardinal is absolute, for $V_\kappa$, where $\kappa$ is i...
Since this is really just a question about absoluteness, let me leave inaccessibility behind for the moment and focus on a simpler still-interesting example: cardinal-ness.
Suppose $\alpha$ is an ord …
15
votes
Accepted
What is the least inaccessible cardinal for Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?
I missed the inaccessibility requirement initially - fixed!
Since $\mathsf{TG}$ is "just" $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + "There is a proper class of inaccessible cardinals," an inaccessible $\alpha$ satisfies $V_\a …
4
votes
How can the critical point of an elementary embedding be omega_1?
Indeed, you cannot have an elementary embedding $j:V\rightarrow M$ with critical point $\omega_1^V$. However, there are some subtleties to keep in mind:
We could have an elementary embedding $j:W\ri …
7
votes
Accepted
Separation of large cardinal notions
Let me argue that Kunen's argument actually shows the best possible thing here.
First, let's think about consistency results. The "ideal" result here would be:
(i) Con(ZFC) implies Con(ZFC + "The …
4
votes
Elementary submodels of V
Two comments on this:
First, it's not clear that one can formulate "there exists a transitive set $S\in V$ such that $S\prec V$" in first-order logic, so it's a bit tricky to phrase your question pre …
4
votes
Accepted
smallest ordinal $\alpha$ such that $L \cap P(L_\alpha)$ is uncountable
Really, this was answered in the comments; I'm putting this answer down to move this off the unanswered queue. I've made this CW and will delete it if one of the original commenters adds their own ans …
5
votes
Accepted
Why the restrictions in the definition of Berkeley cardinals?
Dropping transitivity doesn't actually add anything: given $M\supseteq\kappa$, just consider $\hat{M}=$ the Mostowski collapse of $M$. Given $\alpha<\kappa$ and $j:\hat{M}\rightarrow \hat{M}$ nontrivi …
2
votes
Accepted
Is the principle of indifference of hierarchical construction consistent? What's its consist...
This question can be more clearly phrased as:
Is the principle "We can iterate powerset along any (definable) class-well-ordering" (which is really a scheme, appropriately) consistent with ZFC?
…
4
votes
Would loss of downward absoluteness for large cardinals repeat itself upwardly?
It depends on the large cardinal property.
For example, inaccessibility is downwards-absolute: if $V\models$ "$\kappa$ is inaccessible" and $W$ is an inner model of $V$ then $W\models$ "$\kappa$ is in …
9
votes
Operations on the set of large cardinal axioms
At least for Mahlo-ness, things are pretty simple to describe:
Given a property $P(\kappa)$ of cardinals implying strong inaccessibility, let $P^{\mathrm{Mahlo}}(\kappa)$ be the property "$\kappa$ ha …