Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with super-linear-algebra
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 78
4
votes
Contraction of graded vector fields on de Rham complex
I don't know whether to take your last line as an invitation or a slight, but I'll do my best with an answer. As you probably already know, I am (often uselessly) verbose.
I like to think of $\Omega …
- 54.6k
5
votes
Accepted
A good reference for learning about super-differentiation & super-integration?
I have never tried to keep straight the different sign conventions in the literature. There is a good reason for this: it is a theorem of category theory that any reasonable sign convention is as goo …
- 54.6k
15
votes
Accepted
Is the category $\operatorname{sVect}$ an "algebraic closure" of $\operatorname{Vect}$?
$\newcommand\sVec{\mathrm{sVec}}\newcommand\Vec{\mathrm{Vec}}$Yes. Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, $\sVec$ is the algebraic closure of $\Vec$. By "algebraic closure" of $K$ I …
- 54.6k