Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 7666

Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.

36 votes
Accepted

Is every commutative ring a limit of noetherian rings?

The answer is no to all questions except 4. Negative answers to 1,2 and 3: It is easy to construct a ring $A$ with an element $a$ satisfying: (i) $a≠0$, (ii) $a$ is nilpotent, (iii) for each $n≥1 …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
15 votes

Do disjoint unions and fiber products commute?

Answer to 2: If $A$, $B$, $C$ are three sets, it is not true in general that $(A\times B)\coprod C=(A\coprod C)\times (B\coprod C)$. Hence the category $(Sets)^{op}$ is a counterexample. EDIT: (March …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
13 votes

Rigidity of the category of schemes

A scheme $X$ is reduced if and only if the natural map $$  \coprod_{x\in X}\operatorname{Spec}  \kappa( x )\to X$$ is an epimorphism. So "reduced" is categorical, and so is $X\mapsto X_{red}$.   [EDI …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
12 votes

Categorical interpretation of quasi-compact quasi-separated schemes

Let me show that if $\Gamma$ preserves filtered colimits, then $X$ is quasicompact. (At the moment I don't know about 'quasiseparated'; but, as Martin points out, I only use the injectivity of $\varin …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
11 votes

Is the category of schemes wellpowered? regularly wellpowered?

If I understand the question correctly, the category of schemes is regularly wellpowered. A locally closed immersion factors as $Y\xrightarrow{i}U\xrightarrow{j}X$ where $j$ (resp. $i$) is an open (r …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Is being a coequalizer a target-local property in schemes? (answered: no, and no)

Let me start with a remark [EDITED for clarity after Andrew's comments]. Given $h:X\to Y$, the following are equivalent: (1) $h$ is the coequalizer of some $W\rightrightarrows X$, (2) $h$ is the coequ …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Is the category of schemes wellpowered? regularly wellpowered?

Now I am told that the category of affine schemes is wellpowered (equivalently, the category of commutative rings is cowellpowered). Let me deduce from this that the category of schemes is wellpowered …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Let A be an Artin algebra. What happens if the limit and inverse limit are the same in mod A?

Let me show that every such $Z$ has finite length. First, note that being of the form $\varinjlim X_i$ (with the $X_i$ of finite length) is the same as being countably generated over $A$. So let us st …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Classifying functors of abelian categories

If we require an isomorphism (as opposed to an equivalence) the answer is no, for reasons having little to do with the (interesting aspect of) the question. Assume there exists an abelian category $T …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
3 votes

Limit along the category of all algebraic curves over a field

Here is a counterexample. Put $F(X)=\mathbb{Q}$ for all $X$, and for every morphism $f:X\to Y$ put $F(f)=$ multiplication by $\deg(f)$. Now assume $V$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space and $\phi:\underli …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
2 votes

Weakly initial sets - examples and nonexamples

How about the category of sets with injective maps as morphisms? As an ad hoc example, this may not count as "natural", but it's simple enough. [EDIT] following Martin's comment: take the dual, or r …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
2 votes

Regular monomorphisms of schemes

Not quite an answer, but too long for a comment. Combining the two (open/closed) gluing constructions, we can conclude that if $Z$ is an open subscheme of a closed subscheme $W$ of $X$, then it is an …
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar