Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
2
votes
Accepted
About the filtration of crystalline cohomology
Let me upgrade my comment to an answer:
The answer is no, the filtration is not independent of the lifting. In fact the relationship between liftings of $Y$ and filtrations lifting the Hodge filtratio …
3
votes
Accepted
Non-abelian Berthelot comparison?
Yes. A Google search will immediately give you lots of articles in varying generality (see e.g. work of Shiho), but one article I'm particularly fond of is Kim and Hain's "A de Rham-Witt approach to c …
5
votes
Accepted
F-crystals from crystalline cohomology
I shall try to stick to the notation in Katz's paper. Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p>0$. Let $S_{\infty}$ be a $p$-adically complete and separated smooth formal $W(k)$-scheme and $f:X …
4
votes
Interpretation of the formal groups arising from the DeRham-Witt complex
This is an old question but since it hasn't received much attention, let me just point out "the next" example beyond that given in the question:
Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p>0$, and …
0
votes
Interpretation of the formal groups arising from the DeRham-Witt complex
Let me add a different answer.
Let $p$ be a prime with $p>\dim X$. Let $\mathcal{K}_{i}$ denote the higher $K$-sheaf on $X$, and let $S\mathcal{K}_{i}:=\mathrm{im}((\mathcal{O}_{X}^{\times})^{\oplus i …