Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 75

The theory of lattices in the sense of order theory. For the number-theoretic notion, use the tag "lattices" instead.

11 votes
Accepted

Embedding finite lattices into the lattice of partitions of a finite set

Yes, this is apparently a fairly hard theorem of Pudlak and Tuma (or at least I assume it is hard, because it seems to have been an open problem for decades before they finally proved it in 1980).
Eric Wofsey's user avatar
  • 31.2k
8 votes
Accepted

Cardinality of pairwise non-isomorphic complete lattices on an infinite cardinal $\kappa$

There is a trivial upper bound of $2^\kappa$. In fact, this bound can already be achieved for complete totally ordered sets. For instance, given any subset $A\subseteq\kappa+1$, let $L_A$ be obtaine …
Eric Wofsey's user avatar
  • 31.2k
8 votes
Accepted

Does ${\cal Id}(L) \cong {\cal Id}(K)$ imply $L\cong K$?

No; in fact, we can canonically recover $L$ from $\mathcal{Id}(L)$ as the sublattice of compact elements (that is, elements $x$ such that whenever $x=\bigvee S$, there is a finite subset $F\subseteq S …
Eric Wofsey's user avatar
  • 31.2k
4 votes

Complete non-isomorphic lattices with injective complete homomorphisms between them?

For a simple example with complete total orders, take $L=\{0\}\cup[1,2]$ and $K=\{-1,0\}\cup[1,2]$.
Eric Wofsey's user avatar
  • 31.2k
3 votes
Accepted

Lattice homomorphism from ${\cal Id}(L)$ onto $L$

Here's a counterexample. Let $L=\{0,1,x_0,x_1,x_2,\dots,y\}$, where $x_0<x_1<x_2<\dots$ and $y$ is incomparable with every $x_n$. Then the only non-principal ideal in $L$ is $I=\{0,x_0,x_1,\dots\}$; …
Eric Wofsey's user avatar
  • 31.2k