Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
0
votes
Components of a Fiber Product
Edit: I gave a proof of a false statement earlier. It can be salvaged to the folowing much weaker statement: the point $(x,y)$ is in the dominant irreducible component if we have $df|_x(T_x)+dg|_y(T_y …
8
votes
Number of points of algebraic curve
Edit The original diagonalization argument function I gave didn't satisfy the inequality. The following answer works.
A diagonalization argument works here to show there aren't! Take an enumeration $X …
3
votes
Cotangent complex of certain dg-scheme
Well, unless I am mistaken, whenever you have a cdg ring given by dg generators and relations, then the cotangent space at zero is simply the cone of the differential $T^*\text{Spec}(S^*{\text{generat …
2
votes
Topological version of K-theory of coherent sheaves
I don't think K-homology will satisfy your requirements. The reason people think of G-theory as dual to K-theory is because for proper $X$, the graded space $Ext^*(F,Q)$ is finite-dimensional for $F$ …
5
votes
Galois twist of a variety
Just follow your nose. Functoriality of cohomology gives a map $\operatorname{Aut}(X_\bar{\mathbb{Q}})\to \operatorname{Aut}\big(H^q_{\text{ét}}(X_{\bar{\mathbb{Q}}}, \mathbb{Q}_\ell)\big)$ (actually, …
4
votes
Accepted
Formal completion of an elliptic curve along the $0$ sectioin and the formal expansion of fu...
Yes, what you are saying is true, at least over an algebraically closed base $k$ of characteristic $0$. In fact, all you need is that $S$ is affine and that the normal bundle $I/I^2$ is trivial (as a …
2
votes
0
answers
73
views
What should I call a log scheme with free reduced monoids?
This is a terminology question about a class of log varieties.
Given an fs (fine and saturated) log variety $(X, M)$ (for $M$ the defining sheaf of monoids), any geometric point $x\in X$ has a finitel …
7
votes
1
answer
748
views
What's a (infinity-) semi-stack?
A stack is an object that mixes the notions of (algebraic) space and group. The key insight of stack theory is that most things you would want to do with spaces you can do with stacks: namely, you hav …
4
votes
1
answer
283
views
Weak homotopy equivalence of sites
There are several notions of weak homotopy equivalence for topological spaces. The standard one can be formulated as follows: a map of spaces $X\to Y$ is a homotopy equivalence if the map of simplicia …
2
votes
1
answer
247
views
Is the property of being a dg generator open?
Suppose $\mathcal{C}$ is a dg category (over some base) with all colimits. We say that $X\in \mathcal{C}$ is a generator if $\mathcal{C}$ is equivalent to $\operatorname{End}_\mathcal{C}X$-modules (vi …
2
votes
How much of a variety can be reconstructed from codimension-zero data?
I realized the answer is almost certainly "no", so I asked a better version of this question at How much of a variety can be reconstructed from codimension-zero data?.
I think that if you take two hy …
2
votes
0
answers
290
views
Local weak factorization
This is a follow-up to question Locally toric resolutions of compactifications, answered by Jason Starr.
In a series of papers (see https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9904076), Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk proves th …
1
vote
Separable extensions & topology vs inseparable extensions and algebra
I would guess that the intuition is that separable extensions extend uniquely over "infinitesimal thickenings", i.e. deformations over a nilpotent base. This makes their classification problem "rigid" …
12
votes
Is forming the Albanese variety a monad?
I'll go ahead and turn my comment into an answer. It does form a monad, but (probably) not a very interesting one. Namely, first note that any pair of adjoint functors $L:\mathcal{C}\leftrightarrows \ …
20
votes
Algebraic machinery for algebraic geometry
I want to offer a possibly heretical opinion based on conversations I've had with people who do algebraic geometry, especially Joe Harris. I think that it is not necessary to know very much commutativ …