Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pr.probability
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 547669
Theory and applications of probability and stochastic processes: e.g. central limit theorems, large deviations, stochastic differential equations, models from statistical mechanics, queuing theory.
1
vote
Accepted
Median of cardinality of set union
It turns out there is a (somewhat absurd) counterexample.
Consider $U=\{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$, $S_1 = \{1\}, S_2 = \{2\}, S_3 = \{3,4,5,6\}$. Then $f_{\mathbf{S}}(1) = \text{median}\{1,1,4\}=1$, yet $f_{\mat …
- 29