Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with model-categories
Search options not deleted
user 529138
A model category is a category equipped with notions of weak equivalences, fibrations and cofibrations allowing to run arguments similar to those of classical homotopy theory.
4
votes
1
answer
514
views
Does derived tensor product preserve fiber sequence？
In lemma 3.1.5 of this paper I read, there is a fiber sequence of the underlying spaces of simplicial commutative rings $A\stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow} A\rightarrow A/\!\!/f$. Here we define the "deri …
- 618
1
vote
Accepted
Does derived tensor product preserve fiber sequence？
I have a possible answer for this question finally, but I am not that sure.
First of all, the question is not that 'correct' because the sequence $Z[T]\stackrel{\cdot T}{\longrightarrow} Z[T]\rightarr …
- 618