Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with descriptive-set-theory
Search options not deleted
user 52833
Descriptive Set Theory is the study of definable subsets of Polish spaces, where definable is taken to mean from the Borel or projective hierarchies. Other topics include infinite games and determinacy, definable equivalence relations and Borel reductions between them, Polish groups, and effective descriptive set theory.
7
votes
1
answer
256
views
Is the set of measurable maps with countable range Borel?
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a standard probability space, and $(Y,\tau)$ an uncountable Polish space. Then the set $L^0(X,\mu,Y)$ of measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ identified up to measure 0 is Polish w.r.t. t …
1
vote
Accepted
Is the set of measurable maps with countable range Borel?
The set of maps in $L^0(X,\mu,Y)$ with countable range is always Borel, and the way to see it is to correctly reformulate the question: we are looking at the set of elements $f\in L^0(X,\mu,Y)$ such …