Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with large-cardinals
Search options not deleted
user 520361
8
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Follow up question: Shelah's "Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away?"
In this answer to the question " Shelah's "Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away?" " the following is stated:
Assume that $\aleph_1$ is not inaccessible in $L$, hence a successor in $L$. So there …
- 83