Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ag.algebraic-geometry
Search options not deleted
user 517283
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
2
votes
1
answer
196
views
How to conclude the quasi-projective case of the derived McKay correspondence from the proje...
I am currently trying to understand the paper "Mukai implies McKay" from Bridgeland, King and Reid (cf. here). Let me sum up the setting we find ourselves in:
Let $M$ be a smooth quasi-projective vari …
- 41
2
votes
0
answers
132
views
Does every faithful action on a scheme act freely on a dense open subset?
Disclaimer: I have asked this question on math exchange a week ago (here), but sadly to no avail. So I decided to escalate my question:
Let $G$ be a finite group acting faithfully on a smooth quasi-pr …
- 41