Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with geometric-langlands
Search options not deleted
user 51424
11
votes
Beilinson-Drinfeld local geometric class field theory
As pointed out in the comments, this is Theorem 6.3.1.2 of Hilburn-Raskin. (It certainly was known much earlier, but I'm not sure what to give as a reference.)
Their proof is stated quite elegantly, i …
- 5,958
3
votes
Accepted
Remark 12.8.8 in Arinkin--Gaitsgory
The answers to your questions can be found in this article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5351. I highly recommend reading it before trying to understand Arinkin-Gaitsgory.
Let me try to resolve your di …
- 5,958
6
votes
0
answers
325
views
Bi-Whittaker functions and local Langlands compatibility
I'm trying to figure out the arithmetic analogue of a key conjecture in the geometric local Langlands correspondence. Briefly, one expects for $K=\mathbb{C}((t))$ an equivalence of dg categories $$\op …
- 5,958