Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with mg.metric-geometry
Search options not deleted
user 504191
Euclidean, hyperbolic, discrete, convex, coarse geometry, metric spaces, comparisons in Riemannian geometry, symmetric spaces.
1
vote
1
answer
101
views
Contraction and consensus on Hadamard manifolds
Let $\mathcal M$ be a Hadamard manifold and $\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n\subseteq{\cal M}$ be $n$ points. Define $\{y_i\}_{i=1}^n$ as the weighted Fréchet means:
$$
y_i=\arg\min_{y\in\mathcal M}\sum_jw_{ij}d^2(y, …
- 125
0
votes
Contraction and consensus on Hadamard manifolds
I have solved this question. One can refer to Lemma 3 in the paper Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization with Dynamic Environments. arXiv:2410.05128v1
- 125