Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
1
vote
Accepted
Vanishing of Motivic Cohomology
I know very little, but my impression from looking at these lecture notes is that it vanishes for non-negative p simply by using bullet (4). Bullet (4) follows from Theorem 2.9 on the previous page wh …
5
votes
Learning a little Motivic Cohomology
My understanding is that motivic cohomology has the ability to describe integral values of L-functions up to a constant (and specifically values of zeta functions up to a sign). An example would be …