Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with higher-category-theory
Search options not deleted
user 49409
For questions involving one or more categorical dimensions, or involving homotopy coherent categorical structures.
67
votes
What is the mistake in the proof of the Homotopy hypothesis by Kapranov and Voevodsky?
The MathSciNet review (by Julie Bergner) of Simpson's book:
Homotopy theory of higher categories,
New Mathematical Monographs, 19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012,
has a note about the …
- 2,633