Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with schwartz-distributions
Search options not deleted
user 490264
A distribution is a continuous linear functional on the space $\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_c$ of smooth (indefinitely differentiable) functions with compact support. Though they appeared in formal computations in the physics and engineering literature in the late $19^{th}$ century, their formal setting was brought up by the work of S. Sobolev and L. Schwartz in the middle of the $20^{th}$ century.
1
vote
Proof that elements of Beppo-Levi-like spaces are functions (and not just distributions)?
After some more thought, I gave up Meinguet's approach above (based on sums of the form $\sum_j c_j\tau_{x_j}f$) for a more direct approach in order to prove continuity of the elements of $H$. Any fee …
4
votes
1
answer
235
views
Proof that elements of Beppo-Levi-like spaces are functions (and not just distributions)?
Context. I am trying to undestand the theory underlying "Beppo-Levi"-like spaces defined as
$$
H = \left\{f\in {\cal S}'(\mathbb{R}^d) \;\left| \; t\times\widetilde{f} \in {\cal L}^2(\mathbb{R}^d) \ri …